Login / Register
Comprehension
Read the following scenario and answer the THREE questions that follow.
Ms. Vineeta Lama, a respected figure in the small town of Jampur, found herself stranded on the road, once again, when her old small hatchback car broke down. Finding herself alone on the deserted road with no one to help, Vineeta, in desperation called Shyam Saigal, the General Manager of Balaji Motors − the only dealership in Jampur that sells Diplomatico cars, the brand that Vineeta drives. Vineeta knew Shyam from her frequent visits for getting her hatchback car serviced. Surprisingly, he arrived within fifteen minutes, accompanied by a mechanic from his dealership. Further, he arranged for the vehicle to be towed and kindly offered Vineeta a ride home. On the way back, he advised Vineeta to exchange her old car with a new Sports Utility Vehicle (SUV) on a good discount from his dealership. He assured her that he would add several additional services to ensure her SUV remained in excellent condition for many years ahead.
Question: 1

Due to her old car’s frequent breakdowns, Vineeta decided it was a time to replace it. She was afraid whether buying a Diplomatico SUV from Balaji Motors, as suggested by Shyam, will be a right decision for her.
Which of the following pieces of additional information will help her the MOST in taking the right decision?

Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • She has no idea which SUV to choose, and she feels that all SUVs are the same.
  • Her brother, an SUV enthusiast, staying in a metro city, has advised her to stay away from Diplomatico Cars.
  • In Jampur, SUVs have a 6-month waiting period; however, one red-coloured Diplomatico SUV, not her favourite colour, is available at Balaji Motors.
  • Jampur, being an old city with congested roads, has a parking problem in many areas.
  • A new dealership of Panther Motors, the highest selling car brand in the country, is about to come to the town soon.
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Phase 1: Comprehend Vineeta's Situation.
Vineeta is contemplating the acquisition of a new SUV to substitute her current vehicle, necessitating critical data for a well-grounded choice.
Phase 2: Assess the Ramifications of Available Choices.
- Choice 1: Insufficient data for informed judgment.
- Choice 2: Presents a subjective view, irrelevant to her local circumstances.
- Choice 3: Lead times and hue preferences are peripheral factors.
- Choice 4: Parking challenges are prevalent in Jampur but do not influence the procurement decision.
- Choice 5: The emergence of Panther Motors, a prominent manufacturer, introduces a viable competitor.
Concluding Selection: (5)

Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

Shyam’s satisfaction from meeting the month’s quota for selling SUVs turned to dismay when one of his young executives nervously told him that he mistakenly punched an extended warranty for free to Vineeta’s purchase contract earlier that morning. This could not be reversed from the company’s system and meant a loss of Rs. 19,000 for the dealership. The executive was very sorry and was ready to take accountability. However, the amount was too large to be borne by the executive.
Shyam was not concerned about placing accountability, but rather the recovery of the loss. He was unsure whether he should ask Vineeta for the money. 
The following pieces of information are available to Shyam:
A. Shyam is aware that Vineeta is very happy with the deal he gave her for the car. 
B. Shyam feels that Diplomatico’s software system is complicated for new employees, which might have also played a role in the error. 
C. Vineeta has a wide network and can connect Shyam with many potential customers. 
D. Vineeta’s brother, a car enthusiast, has enough knowledge of how car dealers operate. 
E. Shyam feels that if he maintains the current sales volume, he might be able to persuade Diplomatico to write off the amount (Rs. 19,000). 
Which of the following combinations, of the above pieces of information, will MOST likely stop Shyam from trying to recover the money from Vineeta?

Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • A & B
  • A & D
  • C & D
  • C & E
  • B & E
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Scenario Analysis.
Shyam is required to address the problem while safeguarding his relationship with Vineeta and his dealership's standing.
Step 2: Combination Evaluation.
- Option 1 (A & B): A and B acknowledge Vineeta's satisfaction and the error; however, they do not provide a method to prevent financial recovery from Vineeta. - Option 2 (A & D): Vineeta’s brother’s awareness could aid Shyam, but A does not directly preclude recovery.
- Option 3 (C & D): Vineeta’s connections are advantageous, but her brother’s knowledge may not dissuade Shyam from seeking recovery. 
- Option 4 (C & E): Vineeta’s connections present Shyam with prospects for new business, and sustaining sales volume could indirectly offset the loss. 
- Option 5 (B &E): Although B and E suggest alternative approaches, they do not capitalize on Vineeta's capacity to benefit Shyam’s dealership.
Final Answer: (4)

Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

Three months passed. While returning from a friend’s house, Vineeta’s new SUV was hit by another car. Fortunately, she was not injured, but the SUV was badly damaged. Surprisingly, when Vineeta took the car for repairs to Balaji Motors, she was told that the repairs would not cost her anything as the extended warranty on her car covered such accidents. Vineeta could not recall purchasing such a warranty; hence, she contacted Shyam. Shyam informed her that the extended warranty was mistakenly punched into her contract by an executive. As this mistake could not be reversed due to the company’s rigid policies, Shyam bore the cost of Rs. 19,000. He further added that Vineeta should consider it a gift from Balaji Motors for purchasing the highest-priced Diplomatico SUV.
As Vineeta rode back home, she wondered if she should pay Rs. 19,000 to Shyam since the extended warranty came to her aid that day.
Which of the following is the MOST compelling rationale for Vineeta to justify not paying Rs. 19,000 to Shyam?

Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • She paid more for the Diplomatico SUV, compared to the price of a similar SUV from Panther.
  • She is aware that for expensive SUVs like hers, dealers often offer free extended warranty
  • The mistake happened three months back and is water under the bridge now.
  • Had the accident not happened, she would not have been aware of the warranty.
  • Shyam would have come back to her if he had needed the money.
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Phase 1: Contextual Appraisal.
Vineeta received an unplanned, extended warranty during a critical period. Her justification for non-payment must center on equitable principles and situational specifics.
Phase 2: Option Assessment.
- Option 1: Price comparisons are invalid as the extended warranty was disconnected from the SUV's initial cost.
- Option 2: This statement, though accurate, fails to legitimize her refusal to reimburse Shyam. 
- Option 3: The temporal progression does not negate the ethical obligation for reimbursement. 
- Option 4: Emphasizes that her knowledge of the warranty was opportunistic, and she would not have considered reimbursement otherwise. This strongly supports her position.
- Option 5: Presumes intent and does not directly address the circumstances.
Conclusion: (4)

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Caselets

Questions Asked in XAT exam