Step 1: Situation Analysis. Raman faces a dilemma regarding project acceptance; the projected completion time surpasses his employment duration at Flying Groceries.
Step 2: Options Evaluation.
- Option 1: Past performance in early project completion does not guarantee similar outcomes here.
- Option 2: The availability of additional resources empowers Raman to delegate tasks efficiently, facilitating project continuation post-his departure.
- Option 3: Suraj's opposition to the update lacks inherent company benefit.
- Option 4: Prior successful projects managed by subordinates demonstrate trust but do not resolve resource constraints.
- Option 5: Undertaking work outside of standard hours does not ensure timely project completion.
Step 3: Recommended Action. Option 2 offers Raman a viable strategy for ensuring the project's seamless transition and eventual success.
Final Answer: (2)
Step 1: Assess Raman's Circumstances.
Raman requires confirmation of his duties concerning summer internship placements and needs a professional and effective method for this verification.
Step 2: Appraise Alternatives.
- Option 1: Submitting an apology may resolve personal conflicts but is not a formal means of securing verification.
- Option 2: Dispatching an electronic mail to Suraj might be beneficial, but it may not guarantee an immediate reply given their strained association.
- Option 3: Engaging with Human Resources guarantees a formal and systematic procedure, circumventing any interpersonal challenges with Suraj.
- Option 4: Dependence on a common acquaintance introduces superfluous complexities and lacks professional decorum.
- Option 5: Utilizing social media platforms represents an informal methodology and is unsuitable for official matters.
Conclusion: (3)
Phase 1: Diagnose Raman’s situation.
Raman requires verifiable proof to substantiate his assertion of increased duties. In the absence of formal records, he must investigate supplementary avenues for corroboration.
Phase 2: Assess potential strategies.
- Strategy 1: Fabricating records from recollection lacks credibility and formal endorsement.
- Strategy 2: Statements from former colleagues offer external validation and possess greater trustworthiness.
- Strategy 3: Public requests via social media risk damaging Raman’s professional standing and are informal.
- Strategy 4: Contacting Suraj may prove unproductive given their strained professional rapport.
- Strategy 5: Approaching the new incumbent is irrelevant, as they may possess no direct insight into Raman’s contributions.
Conclusion: (2)
Ned Flanders and Homer Simpson Partners Limited is a law rm, known for its unwavering commitment to client satisfaction. They treat the clients as family members who have grown along with the rm. Further, they are highly regarded in the industry, consulted by the country’s top organizations. Among the founders, Homer Simpson is amboyant, while Ned Flanders is serious. Together, they bring a dynamic balance to the team.
The organization believes in a strong socialization ritual that bonds the new lawyers (newcomers) with the existing members. Also, the socialization ritual ensures that newcomers fully understand the nature of their work and integrate seamlessly into the company’s culture. During their rst week, newcomers are overloaded with a barrage of artificial tasks, unexpected client calls, and a challenging meeting with the founders. This results in newcomers getting overwhelmed, and doubting their decision to join the rm, only for the founders to meet them and reveal that this is one big prank and a way to welcome them to the organization. This socialization ritual has served them well for the past two decades. However, not all the newcomers appreciate the utility of this ritual.
One of the lawyers, Ms. Lisa Simpleton, who joined in 2023 and went through the same socialization ritual, found it unwelcoming. She believes that other newcomers might also share the same opinion. Lisa thinks that the current generation, especially post-COVID, needs more friendly welcome, and the rm must put an end to this ritual.
Mr. Zubin Mistry is the owner and the chief editor of the newspaper The Pluralist, renowned for its high reporting standards and outstanding writing quality. The Pluralist’s authentic reporting distinguishes it from other newspapers that sensationalize news. They are responsible employers, known to be highly supportive towards their employees. Its news editing team is led by Ms. Ramya Kattabomman, a respected veteran in the newspaper reporting industry, wellknown for her stringent adherence to the ethical standards of newspaper reporting.
Mr. Aditya Swaroop Verma, an award-winning senior journalist, has brought in an exposé into the activities of a mining company, operating in an ecologically vulnerable area. In his hardhitting reporting style, he has presented interviews with tens of people, delineating how the mining company has used illegal means to start mining in that area. These mining activities may lead to the destruction of the local ecological balance. However, Aditya Swaroop is unable to obtain an interview with the management of the mining company.
Aditya Swaroop’s investigative report article offers signi cant revelations about the alleged illegal activities of the mining company which were hardly covered in the media otherwise. Nevertheless, his sources have requested for complete anonymity