Comprehension

The plots below depict and compare the average monthly incomes (in Rs. ’000) of males and females in ten cities of India in the years 2005 and 2015. The ten cities, marked A-J in the records, are of different population sizes. For a fair comparison, to adjust for inflation, incomes for both the periods are scaled to 2025 prices. Each red dot represents the average monthly income of females in a particular city in a particular year, while each blue dot represents the average monthly income of males in a particular city in a particular year. The gender gap for a city, for a particular year, is defined as the absolute value of the average monthly income of males, minus the average monthly income of females, in that year.

Question: 1

In which city did the gender gap, in terms of 2025 prices, change the least, from 2005 to 2015,in terms of percentage?

Show Hint

In such problems, carefully analyze the movement of the dots for each city to find where the gender gap has changed the least or the most.
Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • J
  • E
  • C
  • D
  • I
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Define the gender gap.
The gender gap is the absolute difference between the average monthly incomes of males and females in a given city for the specified years (2005 and 2015).
Step 2: Evaluate gender gap progression.
The change in the gender gap between 2005 and 2015 for each city can be assessed by observing the relative positions of the red and blue markers for each year.
Step 3: Pinpoint the city with minimal gender gap alteration.
Through visual comparison of the gender gap variations across cities, it is determined that city I experienced the least change.
Final Answer: \[\boxed{\text{(E) I}}\]
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

Which of the following statements, about the average monthly incomes of the 10 cities, as represented in the plots, is DEFINITELY FALSE?

Show Hint

When analyzing average monthly incomes, carefully check the data and scales used for comparison in different years and price adjustments.
Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • In terms of 2025 prices, the average gender gap of the 10 cities combined in 2015 was less compared to the average gender gap of the 10 cities combined in 2005.
  • In terms of 2025 prices, the average monthly income of men of the 10 cities combined was less than Rs. 30,000 in 2005.
  • In terms of 2025 prices, in more than half of the 10 cities, average monthly incomes of men were more in 2005, compared to 2015.
  • In terms of 2025 prices, the average monthly income of women of the 10 cities combined was less than Rs. 22,000 in 2015.
  • In terms of 2025 prices, the median monthly income of men of the 10 cities combined were higher than the median monthly income of women of the 10 cities combined, both in 2005 and 2015.
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Analyze the given statements.
Each statement must be verified against the provided plots, which illustrate the monthly incomes of men and women across different cities on a monthly basis. Visual inspection of these graphs will enable statement validation.
Step 2: Identify the false statement.
Statement (B) is determined to be false. The data indicates that in 2005, the average monthly income for men exceeded Rs. 30,000, when adjusted to 2025 prices.
Final Answer: \[\boxed{\text{(B) In terms of 2025 prices, the average monthly income of men of the 10 cities combined was less than Rs. 30,000 in 2005.}}\]
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

Rs.100 in 2025 is worth Rs. 60 in 2015 prices, and Rs. 25 in 2005 prices. Based on the given plots, which of the following statements, about the unscaled incomes, i.e., the incomes before scaling to 2025 prices, CANNOT be correct? (All statements refer to people represented in the given plots.)

Show Hint

When analyzing income data, be cautious of how scaling to 2025 prices impacts the interpretation, especially for gender gaps.
Updated On: Nov 26, 2025
  • Average unscaled income of women was about Rs. 15,000 in 2015 in City G.
  • Average unscaled income of women in City G increased by about 120% from 2005 to 2015.
  • Average unscaled income of men in City E increased by about 140% from 2005 to 2015.
  • The unscaled gender gaps reduced in all 10 cities from 2005 to 2015.
  • Average unscaled income for both genders increased in all 10 cities from 2005 to 2015.
Hide Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Analyze unscaled incomes.
Examine unscaled income data presented in the plots, observing percentage changes between 2005 and 2015.
Step 2: Verify statement accuracy.
Statement (D) is inaccurate as the unscaled gender gaps did not decrease across all cities according to the provided data.
Final Answer: \[\boxed{\text{(D) The unscaled gender gaps reduced in all 10 cities from 2005 to 2015.}}\]
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Data Interpretation