Question:medium

Directions for questions 86 to 90: Study the tables of the Indian foreign trade given below to answer the questions.

Principal Commodities\' Import - Weight (%)
COMMODITIES2003-042004-052005-06
Bulk imports37.8739.0942.56
Pearls, precious & semi-precious stones9.258.806.42
Machinery10.6310.0010.94
Project Goods0.490.540.57
Others41.7641.5739.51
TOTAL IMPORTS100.00100.00100.00
Total Imports (in Crore of Rupees)359107.66501064.54630526.77
Principal Commodities\' Export - Weight (%)
COMMODITIES2003-042004-052005-06
Plantations0.920.780.71
Agri & allied products8.397.617.21
Marine products2.081.601.40
Ores & minerals3.695.296.02
Leather & mfrs.3.192.892.56
Gems & jewellery16.5617.2915.13
Sports goods0.150.120.13
Chemicals & related products15.4316.0015.10
Engineering goods16.4118.4118.66
Electronic goods2.742.282.18
Project goods0.090.060.13
Textiles18.8615.1614.80
Handicrafts0.700.430.40
Carpets0.900.750.81
Cotton raw incl. waste0.280.100.61
Petroleum products5.548.5711.21
Unclassified exports4.072.662.94
GRAND TOTAL100.00100.00100.00
Total Exports in Rupees Crore293366.75375339.53454799.97
US Dollar Exchange Rate45.951344.931544.2735

The three commodities which had highest export growth rate in the year 2004-05 as compared to the previous year, arranged in descending order of growth rates are:

Show Hint

The export table gives each commodity's weight (%) of total exports, not its rupee value. Multiply the weight by that year's Total Exports figure to get the actual export value before comparing growth rates.
Updated On: Jul 13, 2026
  • petroleum products, ores and minerals, engineering goods
  • ores and minerals, gems and jewellery, chemicals and related products
  • gems and jewellery, chemicals and related products, agri and allied products
  • ores and minerals, chemicals and related products, agri and allied products
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

This question is really testing whether you remember that a table of "weight (%)" values cannot be compared directly across years, because the total the percentages are taken from is different each year. Before ranking growth rates, convert every commodity's weight into an actual export figure using: value = weight% x Total Exports for that year.

Total Exports rose from Rs. 293366.75 crore in 2003-04 to Rs. 375339.53 crore in 2004-05, an overall jump of about 27.9%. A commodity whose weight percentage barely changed would still show export growth close to 27.9% purely from this base effect, so only commodities whose weight percentage rose noticeably will beat that base rate by a wide margin.

Checking the weight percentages from 2003-04 to 2004-05: petroleum products jumped from 5.54 to 8.57 (a big jump), ores and minerals from 3.69 to 5.29 (also a big jump), and engineering goods from 16.41 to 18.41. Working out the actual value growth for each:

\[ \text{Petroleum} = \frac{8.57 \times 375339.53}{5.54 \times 293366.75} - 1 \approx 97.9\% \]\[ \text{Ores \\& minerals} = \frac{5.29 \times 375339.53}{3.69 \times 293366.75} - 1 \approx 83.4\% \]\[ \text{Engineering goods} = \frac{18.41 \times 375339.53}{16.41 \times 293366.75} - 1 \approx 43.5\% \]

Gems and jewellery and chemicals both grew only around 33%, and agri and allied products grew about 16%, all clearly behind these three.

Let's summarize:

  • Always convert a "% weight" figure to an actual value before comparing growth across years, since the total base itself changes.
  • The three fastest growing export commodities in 2004-05 were petroleum products, ores and minerals, and engineering goods, in that order.

So option 1 is correct.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Data Interpretation


Questions Asked in XAT exam