Question:medium

Read the following situation and choose the best possible alternative.

A database software company found out that a product it had recently launched had a few bugs. The product had already been bought by more than a million customers. The company knew that these bugs could cost its customers a lot of money or trouble. However, if it told customers about the bugs, it was afraid of losing its credibility in the market. What would be the most ethical option for the company?

Show Hint

Weigh which option protects customers from real harm while still being honest with them, rather than one that only protects the company's image.
Updated On: Jul 10, 2026
  • Apologize and fix the bug for all customers, even if it means the company has to take a financial loss.
  • Do not tell customers about the bug and fix it only for those who complain, even if this causes losses for the other customers.
  • Stay silent and do nothing about the bug.
  • Stay silent, but quietly launch an improved, bug-free version of the product as soon as possible.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

This is a classic decision-making question about weighing a company's short-term interest, protecting its image and profit, against its real duty toward customers who bought a defective product. The right choice is the one that best protects the customers while still being fair to the company's long-term standing.

  1. Do not tell customers and fix it only on complaint: this leaves silent sufferers unhelped and treats customers unequally depending on who happens to speak up, so it is not fair to everyone affected.
  2. Stay silent and do nothing: this is the weakest option, since it lets known harm continue and shows no responsibility at all toward the customers who already paid for the product.
  3. Stay silent but bring out a bug-free version quickly: this only helps future buyers, not the million existing customers stuck with the faulty product, so it does not fix the actual problem being asked about.

Compared with all of these, openly apologizing and fixing the bug for every customer directly removes the harm at its source and treats every customer the same way, even though it costs the company money in the short run. A short-term financial hit is a smaller price than losing customer trust permanently once a cover-up eventually comes out, which is what would happen with any of the silent options.

Let's summarize:

  • Any option built around staying silent leaves customers exposed to a known problem.
  • Fixing the product for everyone, openly, is the only option that removes the harm for all affected customers equally.
  • Short-term cost to the company is an acceptable trade for long-term trust and fairness.

So the best choice is to apologize and fix the bug for all customers, which is option 1.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Analytical Decision Making


Questions Asked in XAT exam