Stage 1: Grasp the passage's core concept.
The text asserts that the acknowledgment of human fallibility represents the paramount scientific breakthrough of the 20th century. This realization is depicted as a fundamental characteristic of humanity’s advancement and inquisitiveness.
Stage 2: Assess the choices.
- Choice 1: Erroneous. The assertion is philosophical but does not directly correspond to the passage's conclusion.
- Choice 2: Erroneous. Although it suggests a link between unawareness and scientific investigation, it simplifies this connection unduly.
- Choice 3: Erroneous. This is partially accurate but does not encompass the wider consequence of consciousness stimulating inquiry and development.
- Choice 4: Erroneous. The passage does not center on creation as an immediate result of lack of knowledge.
- Choice 5: Accurate. The passage concludes that recognizing ignorance propels humans to pursue enhanced understanding, signifying their progression.
Concluding Selection: (5)
Study the following question carefully and choose the right answer.
Statement: Should articles of only deserving authors be allowed to be published?
Arguments: \[\begin{array}{|c|l|}\hline (I) & \text{No, it is not possible to draw a line between the deserving and the undeserving.} \\ \hline (II) & \text{Yes, it will save a lot of paper which is already in short supply.} \\ \hline \end{array}\]
