Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The setup involves two prisms separated by a mirror. Because faces $a_1b_1$ and $a_2b_2$ are parallel and perpendicular to the mirror, the geometry of reflection implies that the angle of emergence from prism 1 ($e_1$) is equal to the angle of incidence on prism 2 ($i_2$).
Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Snell's Law at prism interfaces.
Minimum deviation condition: $r = A/2$ and $i = e$.
Relation from reflection: $i_2 = e_1$ (due to symmetry of parallel faces and perpendicular mirror).
Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Checking (A) and (D): If prism 1 is at minimum deviation, then $\sin i_1 = \sin e_1 = n_1 \sin(A_1/2)$. Since $i_2 = e_1$, we have $\sin i_2 = n_1 \sin(A_1/2)$. Thus (D) is correct.
If prism 2 is also at minimum deviation, $\sin i_2 = n_2 \sin(A_2/2)$.
Equating both: $n_1 \sin(A_1/2) = n_2 \sin(A_2/2) \implies \frac{n_2}{n_1} = \sin(A_1/2) / \sin(A_2/2)$. Thus (A) is correct.
Checking (C): For thin prisms, $\delta_m = (n-1)A \implies A = \frac{\delta_m}{n-1}$. The angle $\theta$ in the figure is the angle between the two normals or the combined wedge angle. From geometry, $\theta = \frac{A_1}{2} + \frac{A_2}{2}$.
Substituting $A_1$ and $A_2$: $\theta = \frac{\delta_{m1}}{2(n_1-1)} + \frac{\delta_{m2}}{2(n_2-1)}$. Thus (C) is correct.
Step 4: Final Answer:
The correct statements are (A), (C), and (D).