Here is another way to reach the same result, working with totals for all 7 journeys directly instead of first solving for one journey.
Let the total value of goods bought over all 7 journeys be Rs. \(T\). Since the same 20% markup applies to every journey, the total selling price in Bombay across all 7 trips is \(1.2T\).
Total expenses over 7 journeys: travel cost is \(7 \times 2000 = Rs. 14,000\), and the bribe cost is \(7 \times 2500 = Rs. 17,500\). Together, that is Rs. 31,500.
Total net profit over 7 journeys, since Rs. 20,000 is earned on each of the 7 trips, is \(7 \times 20,000 = Rs. 1,40,000\).
Now write the profit equation for the whole set of 7 journeys:
\[ (\text{Selling price}) - (\text{Cost price}) - (\text{Expenses}) = \text{Profit} \] \[ 1.2T - T - 31,500 = 1,40,000 \] \[ 0.2T = 1,71,500 \] \[ T = \frac{1,71,500}{0.2} = 8,57,500 \]Both routes agree: whether we scale up a single journey's cost by 7, or build the profit equation for all 7 journeys together, the total value of goods purchased works out to Rs. 8,57,500. Option (1) only gives the value for one journey, and option (2) is simply double that, so neither matches what the question actually asks for, the value over 7 journeys.
\[ \boxed{Rs.\ 8,57,500} \]