Question:medium

Principle : Foreign judgment binds the parties and is conclusive unless it is obtained by fraud.
Facts : A obtains judgment from US court by producing fake documents.
This question consists of legal principle(s) (hereinafter referred to as ‘principle‘) and facts. Such proposition may or may not be true in the real and legal sense, yet you have to conclusively assume them to be true for the purposes of this section. Principles have to be applied to the given facts to arrive at the most reasonable conclusion. Only one of the alternatives, i.e., (A), (B), (C), or (D) is the most reasonable conclusion. In other words, in answering the following questions, you must not rely on any principle except the principles that are given herein below for every question. Further you must not assume any facts other than those stated in the question. The objective of this section is to test your ability in legal aptitude, study of law, research aptitude and problem solving ability even if the ’most reasonable conclusion‘ arrived at may be absurd or unacceptable for any other reason.

Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts
  • Judgment can be enforced in US
  • Judgment can be enforced in India
  • New suit can not be filed in India on same facts
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

Read the principle as two parts: a foreign judgment normally binds the parties and closes the matter, but that closing effect has one carve out, fraud in obtaining the judgment. The task is to check whether that carve out is triggered here.

A got the US court to rule in his favour by producing fake documents. Fake documents placed before the court to secure a ruling is a textbook case of fraud on the court, so the exception in the principle applies directly to these facts. Once the exception applies, the judgment stops being conclusive between the parties.

With conclusiveness gone, the normal rule against reopening a settled matter no longer protects this judgment. That means the matter is not closed, and a new suit on the same facts can be brought in India, while none of the enforcement-focused options address the real issue raised by the fraud.

So the correct answer is New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts.

Was this answer helpful?
0
Show Solution

Approach Solution -2

For each option, it helps to ask what fact would have needed to be different in this scenario for that option to end up being correct.

  1. New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts: No change is needed at all, the facts already show fraud in obtaining the US judgment, and that fraud is exactly the condition under which the principle allows the earlier judgment's conclusiveness to fall away.
  2. Judgment can be enforced in US: This would require the fraud to somehow not affect the judgment's own validity in its home country, but a judgment obtained through fake documents does not become sound simply because the question shifts to a different jurisdiction, the defect travels with the judgment.
  3. Judgment can be enforced in India: This would only be correct if A's documents had been genuine, so that the judgment retained the conclusiveness the principle normally grants, but the facts specifically describe fake documents, so this option depends on a fact that has been reversed.
  4. New suit can not be filed in India on same facts: This would hold only in a world where no fraud occurred and the judgment stayed binding, again the opposite of what actually happened here.

Since the fraud described in the facts is precisely the trigger the principle names for losing conclusiveness, and no other option's requirement is actually met, the path back to Indian courts stays open.

Therefore, the correct answer is New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Law of Torts

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the 'haves' have to yield place to the 'have-nots'. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force. It may even be that, like a gas kept confined within containers under great pressure, or water held back by a big dam, once the barrier breaks, the reaction will one day sweep back with a violence equal in extent and intensity to what was used to establish and maintain the outward egalitarian form. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction. If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based not on the possession of the maximum material goods by a few or by all but on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others.

According to the passage, egalitarianism will not survive if
View Solution
Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. This unfinished part of his experiment was perhaps even more difficult to achieve than the achievement of political freedom. In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people.

According to the passage, which was the unfinished part of Gandhi's experiment?
View Solution
Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life because in the former he sees the means for perpetuation and survival of his descendants even after his body is reduced to ashes. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction. The root cause of class conflict is possessiveness or the acquisitive instinct.

Which of the following statements is 'not true' in the context of the passage?
View Solution