Five restaurants, coded R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 gave integer ratings to five gig workers – Ullas, Vasu, Waman, Xavier and Yusuf, on a scale of 1 to 5. The means of the ratings given by R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 were 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8 and 3.4 respectively. The summary statistics of these ratings for the five workers is given below.
Ullas
Vasu
Waman
Xavier
Yusuf
Mean rating
2.2
3.8
3.4
3.6
2.6
Median rating
2
4
4
4
3
Model rating
2
4
5
5
1 and 4
Range of rating
3
3
4
4
3
* Range of ratings is defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum ratings awarded to a worker. The following is partial information about ratings of 1 and 5 awarded by the restaurants to the workers. (a) R1 awarded a rating of 5 to Waman, as did R2 to Xavier, R3 to Waman and Xavier, and R5 to Vasu. (b) R1 awarded a rating of 1 to Ullas, as did R2 to Waman and Yusuf, and R3 to Yusuf. To how many workers did R2 give a rating of 4?[This question was asked as TITA]
The task requires an analysis of ratings provided by five restaurants to five workers under specified constraints. The objective is to determine the number of workers who received a rating of 4 from Restaurant R2.
R2 assigned a rating of 5 to Xavier and Waman. (Note: Waman's ratings are from R1 and Xavier's from R2 and R3).
R2 assigned a rating of 1 to Waman and Yusuf.
Identified R2 Ratings: Xavier received 5; Waman and Yusuf received 1.
Calculation of Missing Values:
R2's mean rating is 2.2. Assume R2's five ratings are a, 1, 5, 1, 1.
The equation for the mean is: (a + 1 + 5 + 1 + 1)/5 = 2.2. This simplifies to 7 + a = 11, yielding a = 4. However, based on the available information, a rating of 4 is not required for 'a' by R2.
Conclusion: Restaurant R2 did not assign a rating of 4 to any worker. Answer: 0