| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
The average ratings provided by R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 are as follows:
The total ratings for each movie are:
The matrix below shows the known rating values:
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| V | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 19 |
| W | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
| X | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 |
| Y | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 17 |
Conclusion: Since all ratings are uniquely determined, the count of entries that can still be uniquely determined is 0.
Answer: \( \boxed{0} \)
Based on the average ratings provided by R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 as 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8, and 3.4 respectively, the total sum of ratings for each rater can be computed as follows:
Similarly, the sum of ratings received by items U, V, W, X, and Y are:
This information can be organized into a table. The following table represents this partial data:
| U | V | W | X | Y | Sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | a | b | c | d | e | 17 |
| Sum | 11 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 13 |
Rater R2 provided the ratings 1, 1, 2, 2, 5.
He rated 0 workers.
Given the average ratings provided by raters R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5 as 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8, and 3.4 respectively, the total sum of ratings from each rater can be computed as follows:
Similarly, the total ratings received by items U, V, W, X, and Y are:
This information can be presented in a table. The following table shows this partial data:
| U | V | W | X | Y | Sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | a | b | c | d | e | 17 |
| Sum | 11 | 19 | 17 | 18 | 13 |
The variables 𝑎,𝑏,𝑐,…,𝑦a,b,c,…,y denote the individual ratings given by each rater for each item. The sums at the end of each row indicate the total ratings provided by each rater, while the sums at the bottom of each column indicate the total ratings received by each item.
Regarding item U: Given a median of 2, a mode of 2, and a range of 3:
Regarding item V: Given a median of 4, a mode of 4, and a range of 3:
Regarding item W: Given a median of 4, a mode of 5, and a range of 4:
Regarding item X: Given a median of 4, a mode of 5, and a range of 4:
Regarding item Y: Given a median of 3, modes of 1 and 4, and a range of 3:
Observing column R3, the two missing entries must sum to 8. The only possible combination is 4 + 4. Therefore, we can assign 4 to row U and 4 to row V.
Examining column R1, the missing elements must sum to 17−5−4−1=7. The possible pairs are 3 + 4 or 4 + 3.
Now, considering column R5, the missing elements must sum to 10. The combination 4 + 3 + 3 is not viable as it conflicts with the possible combinations for column R1. Thus, the combination must be 2 + 4 + 4.
We can assign the values 3 + 4 to column R1, and the remaining values will fill column R4. This allows for the completion of the table:
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | Total | |
| U | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| V | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 19 |
| W | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 |
| X | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 |
| Y | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 17 |
From the completed table, it is evident that R1 assigned a rating of 3 to item X.
Therefore, the correct answer is 3.
The sum of ratings for reviewers R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5, based on their average ratings of 3.4, 2.2, 3.8, 2.8, and 3.4 respectively, is calculated as 5 times their respective means:
Similarly, the sum of ratings received by users U, V, W, X, and Y, based on their average ratings of 2.2, 3.8, 3.4, 3.6, and 2.6 respectively, is calculated as 5 times their respective means:
Consolidating the data from partial information (a) and (b) into a table yields:
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | Total | Missing Entries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| V | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 19 | |
| W | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 | |
| X | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | |
| Y | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 17 | - |
Median analysis:
Correct option: (C) R4
R2 median rating is 2 = given to 2 workers
R5 median rating is 4 = given to 2 workers
R4 median rating is 3 = given to only 1 worker.
R3 median rating is 4 = given to 2 workers
The sum of ratings for reviewers R1, R2, R3, R4, and R5, based on an average of 5 ratings each, are: R1: 17 (5 × 3.4), R2: 11 (5 × 2.2), R3: 19 (5 × 3.8), R4: 14 (5 × 2.8), and R5: 17 (5 × 3.4).
Similarly, the sum of ratings received by recipients U, V, W, X, and Y, based on an average of 5 ratings each, are: U: 11 (5 × 2.2), V: 19 (5 × 3.8), W: 17 (5 × 3.4), X: 18 (5 × 3.6), and Y: 13 (5 × 2.6).
The provided partial data is presented in the following table:
| R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 | R5 | Total | Missing Entries | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| U | 1 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 11 | |
| V | 4 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 19 | |
| W | 5 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 17 | |
| X | 3 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 18 | |
| Y | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 13 | |
| Total | 17 | 11 | 19 | 14 | 17 | - |
The median rating given by R2 is 2, assigned to 2 workers. R5's median rating is 4, given to 2 workers. R4's median rating is 3, given to only 1 worker. R3's median rating is 4, given to 2 workers.
Therefore, the correct option is (C): R4.
| A | B | C | D | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 4 | 4 | ? | 4 |
| 3 | ? | 5 | ? | 4 |
| ? | 3 | 3 | ? | 4 |
| ? | ? | ? | ? | 4.25 |
| 4 | 4 | 4 | 4.25 |
| Ullas | Vasu | Waman | Xavier | Yusuf | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean rating | 2.2 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 3.6 | 2.6 |
| Median rating | 2 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
| Model rating | 2 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 1 and 4 |
| Range of rating | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |