Enunciated by Jung as an integral part of his psychology in 1916, immediately after his unsettling confrontation with the unconscious, the transcendent function was seen by Jung as uniting the opposites, transforming psyche, and central to the individuation process. It also undoubtedly reflects his personal experience in coming to terms with the unconscious. Jung portrayed the transcendent function as operating through symbol and fantasy, and mediating between the opposites of consciousness and the unconscious to prompt the emergence of a new, third posture that transcends the two.

In exploring the details of the transcendent function and its connection to other Jungian constructs, this work has unearthed significant changes, ambiguities, and inconsistencies in Jung's writings. Further, it has identified two separate images of the transcendent function: (11) the narrow transcendent function, the function or process within Jung's pantheon of psychic structures, generally seen as the uniting of the opposites of consciousness and the unconscious from which a new attitude emerges; and (22) the expansive transcendent function, the root metaphor for psyche or being psychological that subsumes Jung's pantheon and that apprehends the most fundamental psychic activity of interacting with the unknown or other.

This book has also posited that the expansive transcendent function, as the root metaphor for exchanges between conscious and the unconscious, is the wellspring from whence flows other key Jungian structures such as the archetypes and the Self, and is the core of the individuation process. The expansive transcendent function has been explored further by surveying other schools of psychology, with both depth and non-depth orientations, and evaluating the transcendent function alongside structures or processes in those other schools which play similar mediatory and/or transitional roles.

The above passage is most likely an excerpt from:

Question

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.
For early postcolonial literature, the world of the novel was often the nation. Postcolonial novels were usually [concerned with] national questions. Sometimes the whole story of the novel was taken as an allegory of the nation, whether India or Tanzania. This was important for supporting anti-colonial nationalism, but could also be limiting - land-focused and inward looking.
My new book "Writing Ocean Worlds" explores another kind of world of the novel: not the village or nation, but the Indian Ocean world. The book describes a set of novels in which the Indian Ocean is at the centre of the story. It focuses on the novelists Amitav Ghosh, Abdulrazak Gurnah, Lindsey Collen and Joseph Conrad [who have] centred the Indian Ocean world in the majority of their novels. . . Their work reveals a world that is outward-looking full of movement, border-crossing and south-south interconnection. They are all very different - from colonially inclined (Conrad) to radically anti-capitalist (Collen), but together draw on and shape a wider sense of Indian Ocean space through themes, images, metaphors and language. This has the effect of remapping the world in the reader's mind, as centred in the interconnected global south. ... The Indian Ocean world is a term used to describe the very long-lasting connections among the coasts of East Africa, the Arab coasts, and South and East Asia.
These connections were made possible by the geography of the Indian Ocean. For much of history, travel by sea was much easier than by land, which meant that port cities very far apart were often more easily connected to each other than to much closer inland cities. Historical and archaeological evidence suggests that what we now call globalisation first appeared in the Indian Ocean. This is the interconnected oceanic world referenced and produced by the novels in my book. For their part Ghosh, Gurnah, Collen and even Conrad reference a different set of histories and geographies than the ones most commonly found in fiction in English. Those [commonly found ones] are mostly centred in Europe or the US, assume a background of Christianity and whiteness, and mention places like Paris and New York. The novels in [my] book highlight instead a largely Islamic space, feature characters of colour and centralise the ports of Malindi, Mombasa, Aden, Java and Bombay. . . . It is a densely imagined, richly sensory image of a southern cosmopolitan culture which provides for an enlarged sense of place in the world.
This remapping is particularly powerful for the representation of Africa. In the fiction, sailors and travellers are not all European. . . African, as well as Indian and Arab characters, are traders, nakhodas (dhow ship captains), runaways, villains, missionaries and activists. This does not mean that Indian Ocean Africa is romanticised. Migration is often a matter of force; travel is portrayed as abandonment rather than adventure, freedoms are kept from women and slavery is rife. What it does mean is that the African part of the Indian Ocean world plays an active role in its long, rich history and therefore in that of the wider world.

Answer 1

This question is not about what the passage says, it is about what kind of document says it that way. Read the passage once for content, then a second time only for tone, structure and audience.

A research note: A note is short and narrow, usually reporting a single result. This passage instead surveys a full theory across "this work" and "this book", builds two named sub-concepts, and links them to several other ideas, so it is far too developed to be a note.
An entry on a psychopathology blog: A blog post speaks directly to the reader, often in first person, and keeps jargon light. Here the writing is formal and impersonal throughout, and it assumes the reader already knows who Jung is and what individuation means, which a blog aimed at casual readers would not do.
A popular magazine article: Magazine writing trades precision for accessibility. This text does the opposite, it insists on a precise split between a "narrow" and an "expansive" transcendent function, a distinction that only matters to someone doing close academic analysis.
A scholarly treatise: The passage reviews prior writing for "changes, ambiguities and inconsistencies", proposes a two-part taxonomy, and traces how one part feeds into further constructs like archetypes and the Self. That is exactly the shape of a sustained scholarly argument, so this fits best.

Once options 1, 2 and 3 are set aside for being too short, too informal or too simplified, option 4 is the only one that matches the passage's depth and structure.

Let's summarize:

Dense technical vocabulary and layered sub-definitions point to an academic source, not a note or a blog.
References to "this work" and "this book" analysing Jung in depth signal a treatise-length discussion.

So the passage is most likely an excerpt from a scholarly treatise, option 4.

Answer 2

This question is not about what the passage says, it is about what kind of document says it that way. Read the passage once for content, then a second time only for tone, structure and audience.

A research note: A note is short and narrow, usually reporting a single result. This passage instead surveys a full theory across "this work" and "this book", builds two named sub-concepts, and links them to several other ideas, so it is far too developed to be a note.
An entry on a psychopathology blog: A blog post speaks directly to the reader, often in first person, and keeps jargon light. Here the writing is formal and impersonal throughout, and it assumes the reader already knows who Jung is and what individuation means, which a blog aimed at casual readers would not do.
A popular magazine article: Magazine writing trades precision for accessibility. This text does the opposite, it insists on a precise split between a "narrow" and an "expansive" transcendent function, a distinction that only matters to someone doing close academic analysis.
A scholarly treatise: The passage reviews prior writing for "changes, ambiguities and inconsistencies", proposes a two-part taxonomy, and traces how one part feeds into further constructs like archetypes and the Self. That is exactly the shape of a sustained scholarly argument, so this fits best.

Once options 1, 2 and 3 are set aside for being too short, too informal or too simplified, option 4 is the only one that matches the passage's depth and structure.

Let's summarize:

Dense technical vocabulary and layered sub-definitions point to an academic source, not a note or a blog.
References to "this work" and "this book" analysing Jung in depth signal a treatise-length discussion.

So the passage is most likely an excerpt from a scholarly treatise, option 4.

Over Number	Run Rate
N-2	8.00
N	7.43
N+2	8.11
N+4	8.45
N+6	8.08

Show Hint

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension

Questions Asked in XAT exam