Instead of solving the full system in one go, plug candidate values of Portfolio III (z) into the three requirement equations and see which one actually works. The three needs are 12 common stocks, 6 municipal bonds and 6 preferred stocks, coming from Portfolio I (2 common, 1 bond, 0 preferred), Portfolio II (4 common, 2 bonds, 3 preferred) and Portfolio III (2 common, 2 bonds, 3 preferred).
The preferred stock only comes from Portfolios II and III: $3y + 3z = 6$, so $y = 2 - z$. This already tells us z can only be 0, 1 or 2 for y to stay non-negative, which rules out 3 and 4 right away as candidate values for z.
Since z = 1 and z = 2 both fail, and z = 3 (or higher) is impossible, try $z=0$ directly: $y = 2$, bonds give $x + 4 + 0 = 6 \Rightarrow x = 2$, and common stock checks as $2(2)+4(2)+2(0) = 4+8+0=12$, which matches exactly.
Let's summarize:
So Portfolio III is not offered at all, meaning the correct choice is "None of the above".