List of top Legal Studies Questions on Law of Evidence asked in AIBE

Which of the following statements is not true with respect to Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

The five Golden Principles with respect to Circumstantial Evidence were laid down in which Supreme Court Judgment?

What do you mean by 'onus probandi'?

Read the following statements and choose the correct option. Statement I: Ossification test is the final test to analyze bone fusion for estimating the age of a juvenile as per law. Statement II: Statutory documents like a birth certificate will be given precedence to determine the juvenile. In the context of the above statements under the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, which one of the following options is correct?

Which of the following statements is not true with respect to Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872?

What do you mean by 'onus probandi'?

The five Golden Principles with respect to Circumstantial Evidence were laid down in which Supreme Court Judgment?

Res gestae, Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction is dealt under:

A intentionally and falsely leads B to believe that certain land belongs to A, and thereby induces B to buy and pay for it. The land afterwards becomes the property of A, and A seeks to set aside the sale on the ground that, at the time of the sale, he had no title. He will not be allowed to prove his want of title. - Which Section of the Evidence Act is applicable?

When the Court has to form an opinion upon a point of foreign law or of science, or art, or as to identity of handwriting, or finger impressions, the opinions upon that point of persons specially skilled in such foreign law, science or art, or in questions as to identity of handwriting or finger impressions are relevant and admissible under:

So much of such information, whether it amounts to a confession or not, as relates distinctly to the fact thereby discovered by the police may be proved under:

The question is, whether A owes B rupees 10,000. Which of the following statements are relevant under Evidence Act:

Section 113 (A) of the Evidence Act deals with:

Section 110 of the Evidence Act deals with:

A is accused of waging war against the Government of India by taking part in an armed insurrection in which property is destroyed, troops are attacked, and goals are broken open. The occurrence of these facts is relevant, as forming part of the general transaction, though A may not have been present at all of them. – under which section of the India Evidence Act.

Which of the following sections of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, deals with the relevancy of facts forming part of the same transaction?

Which of the following fact is not relevant in civil and criminal cases under Section 8 of the Indian Evidence Act

The Kashmira Singh Vs State of MP is a leading case on:

One of the following statements is not true, which one is that:

Indian Evidence Act was enacted in

Any question suggesting the answer which the person putting it expects to receive is called :

Dying declaration must be made by

In civil cases Indian Evidence Act bestows burden of proof on

The Kashmira Singh Vs. State of Punjab is a leading case on

Any confessional statement by the accused given to the Magistrate is