Question

The question is, whether A owes B rupees 10,000. Which of the following statements are relevant under Evidence Act:

• A. The facts that A asked C to lend him money,
• B. D said to C in A’s presence and hearing— “I advise you not to trust A, for he owes B 10,000 rupees,”
• C. A went away without making any answer
• D. All of the above

Hint:

Under the Indian Evidence Act, statements or actions made in the course of a transaction that are relevant to the case are admissible.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is D

Step 1: Understanding Relevance Under the Evidence Act.
The Evidence Act defines what facts are relevant in a case. Section 5 of the Evidence Act states that facts which are logically connected to the facts in issue are relevant. In this case, all statements related to the debt owed by A to B are relevant. Step 2: Analysis of Options.
- (a) A asking C to lend money is relevant as it relates to A’s financial situation and his relationship with B. - (b) D’s statement in A’s presence regarding the money owed is a relevant fact, as it directly touches upon A’s obligation to B. - (c) A’s silence upon hearing the conversation is also relevant as it may imply acceptance or admission of the debt. Step 3: Conclusion.
All these facts are relevant as they pertain to A’s financial dealings and are connected to the issue of the debt owed to B.