To solve the problem, we need to find an equivalent expression for the statement \( B \Rightarrow ((\sim A) \lor B) \).
The logical implication \( P \Rightarrow Q \) can be rewritten using logical operations as \( \sim P \lor Q \). Therefore,
B \Rightarrow ((\sim A) \lor B) becomes \sim B \lor ((\sim A) \lor B).
We can simplify the expression \(\sim B \lor ((\sim A) \lor B)\) using the associative and commutative laws of logic:
Applying absorption law:
So, the original statement \( B \Rightarrow ((\sim A) \lor B) \) simplifies to \( B \lor \sim A \).
We aim to match this with the options:
For \( A \Rightarrow B \) we have \(\sim A \lor B\). So \( B \Rightarrow (A \Rightarrow B)\) translates to:
This matches exactly what we derived: \( B \lor \sim A \).
Thus, the statement \( B \Rightarrow ((\sim A) \lor B) \) is equivalent to \( B \Rightarrow (A \Rightarrow B) \).
Correct answer: \( B \Rightarrow (A \Rightarrow B) \).
The number of values of $r \in\{p, q, \sim p, \sim q\}$ for which $((p \wedge q) \Rightarrow(r \vee q)) \wedge((p \wedge r) \Rightarrow q)$ is a tautology, is :
Among the statements :
\((S1)\) \((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow( p \Rightarrow r )\)
\((S2)\)\((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow(( p \Rightarrow r ) \vee( q \Rightarrow r ))\)