To solve the given problem, we need to determine the number of values of \( r \in \{ p, q, \sim p, \sim q \} \) for which the logical expression \(((p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (r \vee q)) \wedge ((p \wedge r) \Rightarrow q)\) is a tautology, meaning it is true for all possible truth values of \( p, q, \) and \( r \).
Let's break down the expression:
- \((p \wedge q) \Rightarrow (r \vee q)\): This implication is true unless the antecedent \((p \wedge q)\) is true and the consequent \((r \vee q)\) is false. If \( p \wedge q \) is true, then both \( p \) and \( q \) must be true. For \((r \vee q)\) to be false, both \( r \) and \( q \) must be false, which contradicts \( q \) being true. Thus, this part is always true.
- \((p \wedge r) \Rightarrow q\): This implication is true unless the antecedent \((p \wedge r)\) is true and the consequent \(q\) is false. So, if both \( p \) and \( r \) are true, \( q \) must also be true.
Now consider the truth values for \( r \) from the set \(\{ p, q, \sim p, \sim q \}\):
- Case 1: \( r = p \)
For \((p \wedge r) = (p \wedge p) = p\), and since we assumed \( p \) is true, \( q \) must also be true, satisfying the conditions and making the expression a tautology. - Case 2: \( r = q \)
Here, \((p \wedge r) = (p \wedge q)\). If both \( p \) and \( q \) are true, the implications hold, making the expression a tautology. - Case 3: \( r = \sim p \)
If \( r = \sim p \), then for \((p \wedge r)\) to be true, \( p \) must be true, but \( r \) is false (since \( r = \sim p \)), which contradicts, thus not a tautology. - Case 4: \( r = \sim q \)
If \( r = \sim q \), the conjunction with \( p \) and the requirement \( q \) must also be true create contradictions similar to the previous case, failing to make the expression a tautology.
Therefore, the number of values for \( r \) that make the expression a tautology is \(2\). Thus, the correct answer is 2.