The figure above shows the schedule of four employees – Abani, Bahni, Danni and Tinni –whom Dhoni supervised in 2020. Altogether there were five projects which started and concluded in 2020 in which they were involved. For each of these projects and for each employee, the starting day was at the beginning of a month and the concluding day was the end of a month, and these are indicated by the left and right end points of the corresponding horizontal bars. The number within each bar indicates the percentage of assigned work completed by the employee for that project, as assessed by Dhoni.To ascertain the veracity of the provided statements, an analysis of the given schedule and definitions is required. This analysis will involve calculating the total project-months for the four employees and the total employee-months for the five projects.
Based on the computed values, statement I is validated as true, while statement II is invalidated as false.
Therefore, the correct designation is: Only I
The objective is to identify project pairs with identical durations. Project duration is defined as the span of months during which at least one employee was engaged. The schedule analysis yielded the following:
The analysis reveals:
Comparing the calculated durations, Project 3 and Project 4 exhibit the same duration. Consequently, the matching pair is Project 3, Project 4.
To rank employees by their annual completion index in descending order, a weighted average completion percentage is calculated for each. The weights are derived from the months spent on their respective projects. The subsequent table and calculations detail this process for each employee:
| Employee | Projects | Months | Completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abani | P1, P2, P3 | 3, 3, 2 | 60, 70, 80 |
| Bahni | P1, P4 | 4, 2 | 30, 90 |
| Danni | P2, P3, P5 | 2, 3, 1 | 90, 60, 80 |
| Tinni | P4, P5 | 3, 3 | 80, 70 |
The employees are ranked in descending order of their annual completion index as follows:
Danni, Tinni, Abani, Bahni