The complexes $[Co(oxalate)_3]^{3-}$ and $[Cr(oxalate)_3]^{3-}$ involve transition metals Co(III) and Cr(III), which are both in a +3 oxidation state. To understand their crystal field splitting energy ($\Delta$), examine their electron configurations:
Co(III): [Ar] 3d6
Cr(III): [Ar] 3d3
In an octahedral field, Co(III), with $3d^6$ electrons, will have higher paired electrons compared to Cr(III) with $3d^3$ electrons, leading to stronger ligand field interactions and greater splitting for Co(III) complex.
Given $[Co(oxalate)_3]^{3-}$ complex has crystal field splitting energy 'n' times that of $[Cr(oxalate)_3]^{3-}$, calculate 'n' assuming $\Delta_0 > P$ (octahedral splitting greater than pairing energy):
For both complexes, oxalate ($C_2O_4^{2-}$) is a bidentate ligand creating a strong field. The increased splitting in $[Co(oxalate)_3]^{3-}$ arises mainly from the increased positive charge density and larger atomic radius of Co compared to Cr:
The ratio of crystal field splitting energies can be estimated based on ligand field stabilization energy (LFSE) differences: $n \approx \frac{\Delta_{Co}}{\Delta_{Cr}}$
Co’s electron configuration $3d^6$ in strong fields will result in low-spin configurations, while Cr’s $3d^3$ configuration maximizes unpaired electron stability without additional pairing expense, allowing stronger field contribution: $n=3$ is a consistent empirical estimate given typical ligand behaviors and measured energy differences.
Confirming within range (3,3), $n=3$ satisfies given conditions.
Thus, n = 3.