Question:medium

Principle: Property can be transferred only by a living person to another living person.
Facts: ‘A’ transfers property of which he is the owner in favor of the unborn child of B.

Show Hint

In legal terms, a property transfer to an unborn child is not valid until the child is born and recognized as a person.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • Property has been transferred to the unborn child
  • Property has been transferred to B
  • Property has not been transferred to the unborn child
  • Property will be transferred to the unborn child after his birth
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Approach Solution - 1

Check the transferee's status at the exact moment of transfer, since the principle requires a living person on both ends of the transaction.

  1. Transferred to the unborn child: Wrong, the unborn child is not yet a living person, which the principle requires.
  2. Transferred to B: Nothing in the facts shows A intended to benefit B rather than B's child.
  3. Not transferred to the unborn child: Since a living transferee is required and the child does not yet exist as one, the attempted transfer does not take effect.
  4. Transferred after birth: The principle doesn't provide for a dormant transfer to activate later; it only governs transfers between persons who are living at the time.

The correct answer is Property has not been transferred to the unborn child.

Was this answer helpful?
0
Show Solution

Approach Solution -2

Assuming each option true.

  1. Transferred to the unborn child: Assume true, then the child must be a living person at the time of transfer. The child is not yet born at that point, so the assumption directly conflicts with the principle's living-person requirement.
  2. Transferred to B: Assume true, then A must have intended B himself as the transferee. The facts describe the intended beneficiary as B's unborn child, not B, so the assumption has no support in what A actually did.
  3. Not transferred to the unborn child: Assume true, then the child's not-yet-born status at the time of transfer must defeat the attempted transfer. That is exactly the case, the principle requires a living transferee at that moment, and the child does not meet it, so the assumption holds.
  4. Transferred after birth: Assume true, then the principle must provide for an attempted transfer to remain dormant and activate later. Its wording only describes transfers occurring between persons who are living at the time, with no mechanism for delayed activation, so the assumption reads in something the text doesn't provide.

Only the assumption that no transfer occurred survives, since the child was not a living person at the moment A attempted it, and the principle requires exactly that.

Therefore, the correct answer is Property has not been transferred to the unborn child.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Property Law


Questions Asked in CLAT exam