Question:medium

Principle: Foreign judgment binds the parties and is conclusive unless it is obtained by fraud.
Facts: A obtains judgment from US court by producing fake documents.

Show Hint

Fraudulent judgments cannot be enforced, and a new suit can be filed in the relevant jurisdiction.
Updated On: Jul 15, 2026
  • New Suit can be filed in India on the same facts
  • Judgment can be enforced in US
  • Judgment can be enforced in India
  • New suit can not be filed in India on same facts
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Approach Solution - 1

Step 1: Understanding the Principle:
A foreign judgment normally binds the parties and closes the matter, but that conclusive effect disappears the moment the judgment is shown to have been obtained by fraud.

Step 2: Applying the Principle to the Facts:
A got the US court's judgment by submitting fake documents, which is fraud on the court. That fraud takes away the judgment's binding, conclusive character, so it no longer stops fresh litigation on the same facts.

Step 3: Evaluating the Other Options:
A judgment built on fake documents cannot be treated as safely enforceable in the US or in India, and since it is not conclusive anymore, nothing stops a new suit from being filed.

Step 4: Final Answer:
A new suit can be filed in India on the same facts, because the fraud strips the US judgment of its binding effect.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Show Solution

Approach Solution -2

Major premise: a foreign judgment binds the parties and is conclusive, except where it was obtained by fraud. Minor premise: A obtained the US judgment by producing fake documents, which is fraud on the court. Testing the options as conclusions:

  1. A new suit can be filed in India on the same facts: This follows directly, since the fraud exception in the major premise removes the judgment's conclusive effect, leaving nothing to bar a fresh suit on the same facts.
  2. The judgment can be enforced in the US: This conclusion would only follow if no fraud exception applied, but the minor premise establishes exactly the fraud that the major premise treats as defeating conclusiveness.
  3. The judgment can be enforced in India: This suffers the identical defect; it ignores the fraud exception that the minor premise squarely triggers.
  4. A new suit cannot be filed in India: This conclusion would follow only if the judgment were still conclusive, but the fraud described in the minor premise is exactly what removes that conclusiveness under the major premise.

Only the first option is consistent with applying the fraud exception in the major premise to the fabricated documents described in the minor premise.

Therefore, the correct answer is a new suit can be filed in India on the same facts.

Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Judgments

Questions Asked in CLAT exam

Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the 'haves' have to yield place to the 'have-nots'. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force. It may even be that, like a gas kept confined within containers under great pressure, or water held back by a big dam, once the barrier breaks, the reaction will one day sweep back with a violence equal in extent and intensity to what was used to establish and maintain the outward egalitarian form. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction. If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based not on the possession of the maximum material goods by a few or by all but on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others.

According to the passage, egalitarianism will not survive if
View Solution
Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): The work which Gandhiji had taken up was not only regarding the achievement of political freedom but also the establishment of a new social order based on truth and non-violence, unity and peace, equality and universal brotherhood and maximum freedom for all. This unfinished part of his experiment was perhaps even more difficult to achieve than the achievement of political freedom. In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people.

According to the passage, which was the unfinished part of Gandhi's experiment?
View Solution
Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): In the political struggle, the fight was against a foreign power and all one could do was either join it or wish it success and give it his/her moral support. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life because in the former he sees the means for perpetuation and survival of his descendants even after his body is reduced to ashes. We have seen, in our time, attempts to achieve a kind of egalitarian society and the picture of it after it was achieved. But this was done, by and large, through the use of physical force. This enforced egalitarianism contains, in its bosom, the seed of its own destruction. The root cause of class conflict is possessiveness or the acquisitive instinct.

Which of the following statements is 'not true' in the context of the passage?
View Solution