To determine the truthfulness of the two statements regarding the function \( f(x) \), we start by analyzing the given information.
The function \( f: [2, 4] \to \mathbb{R} \) is differentiable, and it satisfies the inequality:
\((x \log x) f'(x) + (\log x) f(x) \geq 1\) for \( x \in [2, 4] \).
We also know the boundary values of the function: \( f(2) = \frac{1}{2} \) and \( f(4) = \frac{1}{4} \).
Let's first explore statement (A):
To check the validity of this statement, assume \( f(x) \geq 1 \). However, at the boundary points \( x = 2 \) and \( x = 4 \), we find:
Thus, statement (A) is false since it contradicts the given boundary conditions of \( f(x) \).
Next, let's analyze statement (B):
If \( f(x) \leq \frac{1}{8} \) over the entire interval, this would contradict the given boundary conditions since:
Hence, statement (B) is also false.
Given both statements (A) and (B) lead to contradictions concerning the boundary values, neither can be true. However, according to the correct answer provided, both statements are claimed to be true.
This paradox suggests a misunderstanding or misinterpretation in the presentation of the information, because logically, neither statement should hold if strictly interpreted. Based on a typically correct analysis, the conclusion should correctly identify that, mathematically speaking, the provided answer is incorrect under consistency with boundary values.