To determine whether the assertion and reason are true and whether the reason correctly explains the assertion, we must understand the chemistry behind the fluorescence of beryllium chloride (BeCl2) and magnesium chloride (MgCl2), and the concept of excitation energy.
- Assertion (A): BeCl2 and MgCl2 produce characteristic flame.
- The production of a characteristic flame color is related to the ability of the metal ions to become excited when heated and then emit light as they return to a lower energy state. In the case of many alkaline earth metals, like calcium (Ca) or strontium (Sr), this is indeed observable as these metals tend to display noticeable colors.
- However, BeCl2 and MgCl2 are exceptions among their group. Beryllium and magnesium do not typically produce characteristic flame colors because their ionization energies are much higher, meaning they require significantly more energy to get excited compared to other alkali or alkaline earth metals. Thus, BeCl2 and MgCl2 actually do not produce characteristic visible colors readily. Hence, Assertion (A) is false.
- Reason (R): The excitation energy is high in BeCl2 and MgCl2.
- This statement accurately describes the situation for BeCl2 and MgCl2. The high excitation energy means these compounds or their elements do not easily impart color to a flame. Therefore, Reason (R) is true.
Conclusion: The assertion provided that BeCl2 and MgCl2 produce characteristic flame is not true, while the reason stating the high excitation energy is accurate. Therefore, the correct answer is: (A) is false but (R) is true.