Equivalent statement to (p\(\to\)q) \(\vee\) (r\(\to\)q) will be
(p \(\wedge\) r) \(\to\) q
(p \(\vee\) r) \(\to\) q
(q \(\to\) r) \(\vee\) (p \(\vee\) r)
(r \(\to\) p) \(\wedge\) (q \(\to\) r)
To find an equivalent statement for \((p \to q) \vee (r \to q)\), we need to analyze the logical structures and apply equivalent transformations.
The correct answer from the given options is (p ∧ r) → q, which encompasses cases where both p and r being true implies q.
The number of values of $r \in\{p, q, \sim p, \sim q\}$ for which $((p \wedge q) \Rightarrow(r \vee q)) \wedge((p \wedge r) \Rightarrow q)$ is a tautology, is :
Among the statements :
\((S1)\) \((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow( p \Rightarrow r )\)
\((S2)\)\((( p \vee q ) \Rightarrow r ) \Leftrightarrow(( p \Rightarrow r ) \vee( q \Rightarrow r ))\)