Question:medium

Directions for sentence exclusion: Five sentences are given below; out of these, four come together to form a coherent paragraph, but one sentence does not fit into the sequence. Choose the sentence that does not fit into the sequence.

Updated On: Jan 15, 2026
  • The legal status of resources mined in space remains ambiguous; and while the market for asteroid minerals is currently nonexistent, this is likely to change as technical hurdles diminish.
  • Outer space is a commons, and all of it is open for exploration, however, space law developed in the 1950s and 60s is state-centric and arguably ill-suited to a commercial future.
  • Laws adopted by the US and Luxembourg are first steps, but they only protect firms from competing claims by their compatriots; a Chinese company will not be bound by US law.
  • Critics say the US is conferring rights that it has no authority to confer; Russia in particular has condemned this, citing the US’ disrespect for international law.
  • At issue now is commercial activity, as private firms—rather than nation states—look to space for profit.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

The provided sentences address legal issues and the commercialization of space. To isolate the sentence that disrupts paragraph coherence, analyze each sentence's alignment with the central theme.
The central theme appears to be the evolution of space law and its impact on commercial ventures.
  1. Sentence 1: Addresses the legal uncertainty and future market potential of space resources.
  2. Sentence 2: Points out the inadequacy of current space law given projected commercial activities.
  3. Sentence 3: Discusses national legislative actions and their international constraints.
  4. Sentence 5: Details the transition from government-led exploration to private sector investment in space.
Conversely, Sentence 4 focuses on international disapproval of the US' stance on space law, rather than the commercialization and legal development of space. This sentence deviates from the core topic by emphasizing geopolitical criticism.
Therefore, the sentence that disrupts the paragraph's flow and coherence is: Critics say the US is conferring rights that it has no authority to confer; Russia in particular has condemned this, citing the US’ disrespect for international law.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Jumbled Paragraphs

Questions Asked in CAT exam

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the essence of the passage.
In the dynamic realm of creativity, artists often find themselves at the crossroads between drawing inspiration from diverse cultures and inadvertently crossing into the territory of cultural appropriation. Inspiration is the lifeblood of creativity, driving artists to create works that resonate across borders. In a globalized era of the modern world, artists draw from a vast array of cultural influences. When approached respectfully, inspiration becomes a bridge, fostering understanding and appreciation of cultural diversity. However, the line between inspiration and cultural appropriation can be thin and easily blurred.
Cultural appropriation occurs when elements from a particular culture are borrowed without proper understanding, respect, or acknowledgment. This leads to the commodification of sacred symbols, the reinforcement of stereotypes, and the erasure of the cultural context from which these elements originated. It is essential to recognize that the impact of cultural appropriation extends beyond the realm of artistic expression, influencing societal perceptions and perpetuating power imbalances.
View Solution