Approach: Instead of grinding the whole grid, test the target cell directly \(-\) if you can exhibit two fully valid completions that disagree on Clive\(\to\)Ehsaan, the answer is settled as undetermined.
Rules recap: Five players each ask one question; the other four tap Yes $=1$, No $=2$, Maybe $=3$. Every question gets at least one of each, and total taps $=40$. Given: Alia received 9; Badal, Dilshan, Ehsaan each received 8; Clive received 7. Players gave: Alia 6, Badal 6, Clive 8, Dilshan 11, Ehsaan 9. Alia tapped Yes to Clive and Dilshan.
Witness 1. Take Clive's four taps as $A:3,\,B:2,\,D:2,\,E:1$ (sum 8). Pair this with Ehsaan giving $A:3,B:1,C:2,D:3$ and the other rows chosen so each column hits its target (A:9, B:8, C:7, D:8, E:8) and every question has a Yes, a No and a Maybe. This is consistent, and here Clive answered Ehsaan with $1$ \(=\) Yes.
Witness 2. Now shift Clive's taps to $A:3,\,B:2,\,D:1,\,E:2$ (still sum 8) and rebalance the Badal/Ehsaan rows so all column totals stay 8 and the per-question rule still holds. This is equally consistent, but now Clive answered Ehsaan with $2$ \(=\) No.
Conclusion. Two legal grids give two different answers for the same cell, so no single reply is forced.
\[ \boxed{\textbf{Cannot be determined}} \]
Statement: All flowers are beautiful. Some beautiful things are fragile.
Conclusion I: Some flowers are fragile.
Conclusion II: All beautiful things are flowers.