Step 1: Determine potential initial frequencies of the unknown fork. Let the unknown frequency be \(f_1\). The reference frequency is \(f_2 = 256\) Hz. The initial beat frequency is \(f_{beat} = |f_1 - f_2| = 4\) Hz. This yields two possibilities for \(f_1\): \(f_1 = 256 + 4 = 260\) Hz or \(f_1 = 256 - 4 = 252\) Hz.
Step 2: Analyze the effect of adding wax. Adding wax increases the mass of a tuning fork, causing its frequency to decrease. Let the new frequency of the first fork be \(f_1'\), where \(f_1'<f_1\).
Step 3: Test the two initial possibilities with the new information. The new beat frequency is 3 Hz.- Case A: Initial \(f_1 = 260\) Hz. After adding wax, \(f_1'\) is slightly less than 260 Hz. The new beat frequency is \(|f_1' - 256|\). As \(f_1'\) decreases from 260 Hz towards 256 Hz, this difference decreases. It is plausible for the beat frequency to become 3 Hz, which is consistent.- Case B: Initial \(f_1 = 252\) Hz. After adding wax, \(f_1'\) is slightly less than 252 Hz. The new beat frequency is \(|f_1' - 256| = 256 - f_1'\). As \(f_1'\) decreases further from 252 Hz, it moves away from 256 Hz, increasing the difference. The beat frequency would increase beyond 4 Hz, contradicting the observed 3 Hz. This case is inconsistent.
Step 4: Conclude the initial frequency. Only Case A is consistent with the experimental results. Therefore, the original frequency of the first fork was 260 Hz.