Comprehension
Until the Keeladi site was discovered, archaeologists by and large believed that the Gangetic plains in the north urbanised significantly earlier than Tamil Nadu. Historians have often claimed that large scale town life in India first developed in the Greater Magadha region of the Gangetic basin. This was during the ‘second urbanisation’ phase. The ‘first urbanisation phase’ refers to the rise of the Harappan or Indus Valley Civilisation. Tamil Nadu was thought to have urbanised at this scale only by the third century BCE. The findings at Keeladi push that date back significantly. … Based on linguistics and continuity in cultural legacies, connections between the Indus Valley Civilisation, or IVC, and old Tamil traditions have long been suggested, but concrete archaeological evidence remained absent. Evidence indicated similarities between graffiti found in Keeladi and symbols associated with the IVC. It bolstered the arguments of dissidents from the dominant North Indian imagination, who have argued for years that their ancestors existed contemporaneously with the IVC. … All the archaeologists I spoke to said it was too soon to make definitive links between the Keeladi site and the IVC. There is no doubt, however, that the discovery at Keeladi has changed the paradigm. In recent years, the results of any new research on early India have invited keen political interest, because proponents of Hindu nationalism support the notion of Vedic culture as fundamental to the origins of Indian civilisation. … The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life. They indicate the possibility that the earliest identity that can recognisably be considered ‘Indian’ might not have originated in North India. That wasn’t all. In subsequent seasons of the Keeladi dig, archaeologists discovered that Tamili, a variant of the Brahmi script used for writing inscriptions in the early iterations of the Tamil language, could be dated back to the sixth century BCE, likely a hundred years before previously thought. So not only had urban life thrived in the Tamil lands, but people who lived there had developed their own script. “The evolution of writing is attributed to Ashoka’s edicts, but 2600 years ago writing was prevalent in Keeladi,” Mathan Karuppiah, a proud Madurai local, told me. “A farmer could write his own name on a pot he owned. The fight going on here is ‘You are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.’”
[Excerpted from “The Dig”, by Sowmiya Ashok, Fifty-Two]
Question: 1

What was the assumption about the origin of urban life in India before the Keeladi dig?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • The origins lay in the northern Gangetic plains, which urbanised earlier than the south.
  • The Indus Valley Civilization was the first urban civilization of India.
  • The second urbanization was known to be in the Magadha empire.
  • Both (A) and (B)
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We need to identify the specific pre-Keeladi assumption the passage names, not just any true background fact mentioned in the text.

Key Approach:
Read the passage's opening sentence closely, since it is the sentence that directly sets up what the Keeladi dig is shown to challenge.

Detailed Explanation:
The first sentence states that archaeologists 'believed that the Gangetic plains in the north urbanised significantly earlier than Tamil Nadu.' This is the specific assumption under discussion. The passage also explains what the 'first' and 'second' urbanisation phases mean, the Indus Valley Civilisation and Magadha respectively, but these are background definitions, not themselves the assumption the Keeladi findings are shown to overturn.

Final Answer:
The assumption being challenged is that the north urbanised earlier than the south, matching option (A).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

“The Keeladi excavations further challenge the idea of a single fountainhead of Indian life.” — in elaboration of this sentence, which of these options follows?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Dominant theories of how urban and modern life came about in ancient India were proved wrong by the Keeladi archaeological dig.
  • Neither the Indus Valley Civilization, nor the ancient urban civilization of Magadha are clear explanations of how urban life emerged in the Keeladi region of southern India in the third century BCE.
  • The Keeladi archaeological dig proved that Indian urban and modern life emerged independently in several historical periods and geographies, and no one theory is enough to explain it.
  • None of the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Concept:
This question asks us to unpack a metaphorical phrase, 'single fountainhead,' and match it to the option that best restates its meaning in plain terms.

Key Approach:
Treat 'fountainhead' as meaning a single source or point of origin; 'challenging' that idea means arguing for more than one independent origin, not proving any one theory entirely false.

Detailed Explanation:
The passage never claims earlier theories were disproved; in fact it directly quotes archaeologists calling any Indus Valley link 'too soon' to confirm, which rules out the option claiming dominant theories were 'proved wrong.' It also does not limit its claim to just the Keeladi region in one century, since the sentence is about Indian civilisation broadly. What the passage does argue is that the earliest identity we can call 'Indian' may not have started only in the north, supporting the idea of multiple, independent origins across different regions and time periods.

Final Answer:
The sentence means Indian urban life may have emerged independently in several places and periods, so no single theory fully explains it, matching option (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

Language, including a script similar to the Brahmi script, emerged in Keeladi in the sixth century BCE. Which of the following is the most convincing conclusion from this statement?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Keeladi is a centre of culture and learning far superior to any others in ancient India.
  • People of Keeladi were illiterate and could not use language to inscribe on their pots and pans.
  • Ancient urban history of India, as we know it today, could significantly be altered by the findings of the advances achieved by the Keeladi civilization.
  • All the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We are asked to pick the most convincing conclusion, meaning the option that follows logically from the fact without overreaching or being contradicted by it.

Key Approach:
Test each option against two questions: does the given fact actually support this claim, and does the claim go further than the evidence allows?

Detailed Explanation:
The claim that Keeladi was 'far superior' to every other ancient Indian centre is a much bigger claim than 'a script existed there,' so it overreaches. The claim that Keeladi's people were illiterate directly contradicts the fact that a script was found there. What is left is the more careful claim: that finding a dated, distinct script pushes back what we thought we knew about literacy and urban development in India, which fits both this fact and the passage's broader argument about paradigm shifts.

Final Answer:
The most convincing, properly supported conclusion is that ancient Indian urban history could be significantly revised by Keeladi's findings, matching option (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 4

BCE is the acronym for:

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Before the Common Era
  • Before Colloquial Era
  • Before Chapel Eternal
  • Behind Christ Era
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
This is a direct general knowledge question about a standard historical dating acronym used in the passage.

Key Approach:
Recall that BCE and CE are the modern, secular replacements for the older BC and AD system, used by historians to date events without religious reference.

Detailed Explanation:
BCE stands for 'Before the Common Era,' marking years before year 1 of the calendar in common international use, the same years that 'BC' would have marked. None of the other options, 'Before Colloquial Era,' 'Before Chapel Eternal,' or 'Behind Christ Era,' are real or recognised expansions of the acronym.

Final Answer:
BCE means Before the Common Era, matching option (A).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 5

“A farmer could write his own name on a pot he owned. The fight going on here is ‘You are not the one to teach me to write, I have learnt it myself.’ ” — These sentences imply:

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • That the Keeladi civilization was an inegalitarian one.
  • That the Keeladi civilization did not conserve the access to education and literacy only for the elite.
  • That the farmers of the Keeladi civilization were also potters.
  • All the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Concept:
This question tests whether we can correctly interpret what a quoted local voice is implying about literacy in ancient Keeladi society.

Key Approach:
Focus on who is speaking about writing in the quote, a farmer, not a ruler or priest, and what the defiant tone of 'I have learnt it myself' suggests about access to that skill.

Detailed Explanation:
A farmer being able to write his own name on a pot he owned shows literacy was not restricted to a narrow, elite class; if only the elite could read and write, this quote would not make sense as an example. This rules out the option calling Keeladi 'inegalitarian,' since the quote actually shows the opposite, broader access. It also rules out concluding farmers were potters, since owning a pot does not mean making one.

Final Answer:
The quote implies literacy was not reserved only for the elite in Keeladi society, matching option (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in CLAT exam