In a double-slit experiment, if one slit is closed, the wave from the single open slit diffracts, creating a diffraction pattern on the screen. Thus, the assertion is true.
Regarding the reason:
- The statement "For interference, at least two waves are required" is true in isolation.
- However, the reason must explain the assertion.
- The assertion specifically concerns diffraction, not interference.
- Therefore, while the reason is a valid statement, it is not relevant to the assertion and is considered false in the context of cause-and-effect explanation.
Conclusion:
- Assertion (A) is true.
- Reason (R) is false (as an explanation for the assertion).
Final answer: Option (C)