To determine the number of unpaired electrons in the complexes, we need to evaluate the electron configuration and bonding nature of the central metal in each complex.
- For $[\text{Ni}(\text{CO})_4]$: Nickel (Ni) has an atomic number of 28, so its electronic configuration is $[Ar]3d^{8}4s^{2}$. CO is a strong field ligand, causing pairing of electrons. Ni is in the 0 oxidation state: $3d^{10}$. All electrons are paired. Unpaired electrons = 0.
- For $[\text{NiCl}_4]^{2-}$: Ni is in the +2 oxidation state, $[Ar]3d^{8}$. Cl⁻ is a weak field ligand, not causing pairing. Electronic configuration remains as $3d^{8}$, with two unpaired electrons. Unpaired electrons = 2.
- For $[\text{PtCl}_2(\text{NH}_3)_2]$: Pt is in the +2 oxidation state, $[Xe]4f^{14}5d^{8}$. NH₃ is a stronger field ligand than Cl⁻ but doesn't affect pairing of electrons in $5d^{8}$. All electrons are paired. Unpaired electrons = 0.
- For $[\text{Ni}(\text{CN})_4]^{2-}$: Ni is in the +2 oxidation state, $[Ar]3d^{8}$. CN⁻ is a strong field ligand, causing pairing. Configuration becomes $3d^{8}$, all paired. Unpaired electrons = 0.
- For $[\text{Pt}(\text{CN})_4]^{2-}$: Pt is in the +2 oxidation state, $[Xe]4f^{14}5d^{8}$. CN⁻ is a strong field ligand, causing pairing. Electrons are paired. Unpaired electrons = 0.
The total number of unpaired electrons is: 0 + 2 + 0 + 0 + 0 = 2. This result falls within the expected range of 2,2.