Step 1: Use the objective's direction:
Since $z = 4x + y$ weights $x$ much more than $y$, the optimum is near the largest feasible $x$.
Step 2: Largest x:
On the x-axis the constraints give $x \le 5$, $x \le 3.5$, $x \le \frac{11}{3}$. The strictest is $x \le 3.5$, so $(3.5, 0)$ is feasible and gives $z = 14$.
Step 3: Check that nothing beats it:
Moving up the line $2x + y = 7$ from $(3.5, 0)$, $z = 4x + (7-2x) = 2x + 7$ decreases as $x$ falls, and at $(3,1)$ it is 13. The remaining corners give 5 and 8.
Final Answer:
Maximum $z = 14$, option (D).
\[ \boxed{14 \text{ (D)}} \]