
Step 1: {Analyze Assertion (A)}
The graph shows that the line \( Z = x + 2y \) intersects the feasible region at corner points \( (60, 0) \) and \( (120, 60) \), yielding the identical maximum value. This implies the maximum value is attained at all points along the line segment connecting these two points. Therefore, Assertion (A) is true.
Step 2: {Analyze Reason (R)}
Typically, the optimal solution for a Linear Programming Problem (LPP) is found at the corner points of the feasible region. While this statement is generally correct, in this specific instance, the optimal solution extends along a line segment between two corner points. Consequently, Reason (R) does not accurately explain Assertion (A).
Step 3: {Conclusion}
Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true. However, Reason (R) is not a valid explanation for Assertion (A). Thus, the correct option is (B).