Step 1: List what each statement is really asking.
X compares two growth rates (Managerial vs Technical registrations). Y checks whether the combined registration count crossed a 25% growth mark. These need two separate calculations.
Step 2: Work out Managerial growth as a multiplier.
2005 registrations divided by 2004 registrations for Managerial: $45{,}292/19{,}236 \approx 2.354$, which means Managerial registrations became about 2.35 times their old value, a rise of about 135%.
Step 3: Work out Technical growth as a multiplier.
For Technical: $63{,}298/61{,}205\approx 1.0342$, a rise of only about 3.4%. Since 135% is clearly bigger than 3.4%, X holds up.
Step 4: Add up totals for Y and compare against the 25% mark.
Add both categories for each year: 2004 gives $61{,}205+19{,}236=80{,}441$, 2005 gives $63{,}298+45{,}292=108{,}590$. A 25% rise on 80,441 would mean reaching $80{,}441\times 1.25=100{,}551.25$. The actual 2005 total, 108,590, is well past that mark, so the growth is more than 25% and Y is true.
Step 5: Final Answer.
Both claims survive the check, so the correct choice is that both X and Y are true.
\[ \boxed{\text{Both [X] and [Y] are True}} \]