Comprehension
The call of self-expression turned the village of the internet into a city, which expanded at time-lapse speed, social connections bristling like neurons in every direction. At twelve, I was writing five hundred words a day on a public LiveJournal. By twenty-five, my job was to write things that would attract, ideally, a hundred thousand strangers per post. Now I’m thirty, and most of my life is inextricable from the internet, and its mazes of incessant forced connection—this feverish, electric, unliveable hell. The curdling of the social internet happened slowly and then all at once. The tipping point, I’d guess, was around 2012. People were losing excitement about the internet, starting to articulate a set of new truisms. Facebook had become tedious, trivial, exhausting. Instagram seemed better, but would soon reveal its underlying function as a three-ring circus of happiness and popularity and success. Twitter, for all its discursive promise, was where everyone tweeted complaints at airlines and moaned about articles that had been commissioned to make people moan. The dream of a better, truer self on the internet was slipping away. Where we had once been free to be ourselves online, we were now chained to ourselves online, and this made us self-conscious. Platforms that promised connection began inducing mass alienation. The freedom promised by the internet started to seem like something whose greatest potential lay in the realm of misuse.
Even as we became increasingly sad and ugly on the internet, the mirage of the better online self continued to glimmer. As a medium, the internet is defined by a built-in performance incentive. In real life, you can walk around living life and be visible to other people. But on the internet—for anyone to see you, you have to act. You have to communicate in order to maintain an internet presence. And, because the internet’s central platforms are built around personal profiles, it can seem—first at a mechanical level, and later on as an encoded instinct—like the main purpose of this communication is to make yourself look good. Online reward mechanisms beg to substitute for offline ones, and then overtake them. This is why everyone tries to look so hot and well-travelled on Instagram; why everyone seems so smug and triumphant on Facebook; and why, on Twitter, making a righteous political statement has come to seem, for many people, like a political good in itself. The everyday madness perpetuated by the internet is the madness of this architecture, which positions personal identity as the centre of the universe. It’s as if we’ve been placed on a lookout that oversees the entire world and given a pair of binoculars that makes everything look like our own reflection.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion, by Jia Tolentino, Random House, 2019.]
Question: 1

Which of the following statements can be inferred from the above passage?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • The internet expanded very slowly
  • The internet can be used to cause harm
  • The internet is addictive
  • The main purpose of social media platforms is to dissuade people from showing off
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We are asked to find the statement that can be reasonably inferred from the passage, using its actual claims rather than a general impression of the internet.

Key Approach:
Check each option against a specific line in the passage; an inference question is really asking which option is backed by the text, not which sounds plausible in general.

Detailed Explanation:
The passage explicitly describes the internet expanding 'at time-lapse speed,' which rules out the option that it expanded slowly. It also explicitly says platforms push people to 'look so hot,' 'smug and triumphant,' directly contradicting the option that platforms discourage showing off. On addiction, the passage focuses on performance and self-consciousness rather than compulsive use, so that inference is weaker. The clearest, most directly supported statement is the line about the internet's 'greatest potential' lying 'in the realm of misuse,' which is a direct statement about harm.

Final Answer:
The passage supports the inference that the internet can be used to cause harm, matching option (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

All the following statements are ‘truisms’, except:

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • The internet has changed the way the world works.
  • A preference for cat videos can reveal a lot about your personality.
  • Like with any tool, digital technology has both advantages and disadvantages.
  • Only time can tell what the future holds.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Concept:
This question tests the meaning of the word 'truism,' a statement that is obviously true and so general that it is almost never disputed.

Key Approach:
Sort the four options by how general and safe each claim is; a true truism could apply to almost any similar situation, while a non-truism makes a specific, particular claim.

Detailed Explanation:
'The internet has changed the way the world works,' 'digital technology has both advantages and disadvantages,' and 'only time can tell what the future holds' are all broad, safe statements that could be said about almost any major technology or uncertain situation, exactly what makes something a truism. The claim about cat video preferences revealing personality is different: it is a specific, pointed, and debatable idea about a very particular behaviour, not a broad generality that everyone already accepts.

Final Answer:
The statement that is not a truism, and so is the exception the question asks for, is the one about cat videos and personality, option (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

Which of the following comes closest to the underlined sentence in the passage?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • The way we use the internet says a lot about who we are.
  • The internet has reduced the distance between people living across the world.
  • The internet has the ability to customise what we access based on our identity.
  • The internet only shows us what we don’t want to see.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We need to translate a metaphor, binoculars that turn everything into 'our own reflection,' into the plain-language option that best matches it.

Key Approach:
Break the metaphor into its parts: a lookout suggests surveying the wider world, and binoculars that only show a reflection suggest that whatever you look at online is somehow shaped around yourself.

Detailed Explanation:
This rules out the option about reducing distance between people, since that is about connecting outward, not reflecting inward, and it rules out the option that the internet 'only shows us what we don't want to see,' since reflection means showing the self, not unwanted content. Between the remaining two, 'the way we use the internet says a lot about who we are' describes what our behaviour reveals about us, while 'the internet has the ability to customise what we access based on our identity' describes the internet actively shaping what we see around our identity, which is the direction the reflection metaphor actually points in.

Final Answer:
The sentence is best paraphrased as the internet's ability to customise what we access based on our identity, matching option (C).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 4

Which of the following is a metaphor?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • the village of the internet
  • this feverish, electric, unliveable hell
  • three-ring circus of happiness and popularity and success
  • all the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Concept:
This question tests recognition of metaphor, a figure of speech that equates one thing with another directly, unlike a simile, which uses 'like' or 'as.'

Key Approach:
Check each phrase for a direct, as-if-literal comparison rather than a signalled one.

Detailed Explanation:
'The village of the internet' treats the internet as if it were literally a village. 'This feverish, electric, unliveable hell' treats online experience as if it were literally hell. 'Three-ring circus of happiness and popularity and success' treats social media as if it were literally a circus. None of the three uses 'like' or 'as,' and each substitutes one thing for another directly, which is exactly what a metaphor does.

Final Answer:
Since all three phrases are metaphors, the correct choice is 'all the above,' option (D).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 5

Which of the following categories best describes this piece of writing?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Non-fiction essay
  • Fiction
  • Academic paper
  • Poem
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We are asked to classify the passage by its literary form, based on its voice, structure and stated source.

Key Approach:
Look at three signals: whether the piece is written in prose or verse, whether it reads as personal reflection or invented narrative, and where it is credited from.

Detailed Explanation:
The passage is written in ordinary prose paragraphs, ruling out poem. It presents real personal history, the author's own online life since childhood, and reasoned argument, rather than invented characters or plot, ruling out fiction. It also lacks the formal citation and detached tone of academic writing, ruling out academic paper. Its source line credits it to Trick Mirror: Reflections on Self-Delusion, a published nonfiction essay collection by Jia Tolentino.

Final Answer:
All of this points to the passage being a non-fiction essay, option (A).
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in CLAT exam