Question:medium

S. R. Bommai v. Union of India judgement pertained to

Show Hint

"Bommai" $=$ "Article 356".
This case effectively stopped the frequent and political use of Article 356 by central governments.
Updated On: Mar 17, 2026
  • Inter-State Water Dispute
  • Article 356
  • Anti - Defection
  • Fundamental Rights
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Concept:
Article 356 allows the President to impose President's Rule in a state if the constitutional machinery breaks down.
Step 2: Detailed Explanation:
The S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) case is a landmark Supreme Court judgement that checked the arbitrary use of Article 356.
The court ruled that the power of the President to dismiss a state government is not absolute and is subject to judicial review.
It established that the floor of the Legislative Assembly is the only place to test the majority of a government, not the Raj Bhavan.
Step 3: Final Answer:
The S.R. Bommai case pertained to the misuse and interpretation of Article 356.
Was this answer helpful?
0