The correct answer is option (B):
0.46
Let's analyze this problem step by step to determine the relationship between the initial costs of the car and the plot.
Let's denote the initial price of the car as C and the initial price of the plot as P.
Year 1-2:
* Plot value increases by 30%: P becomes 1.3P
* Car value decreases by 10%: C becomes 0.9C
Year 3-4:
* Plot value is unchanged: 1.3P remains 1.3P
* Car value decreases by 20%: 0.9C becomes 0.9C * 0.8 = 0.72C
Year 5-6:
* Plot value increases by 20%: 1.3P becomes 1.3P * 1.2 = 1.56P
* Car value decreases by 25%: 0.72C becomes 0.72C * 0.75 = 0.54C
At the end of the sixth year:
* Value of the plot: 1.56P
* Value of the car: 0.54C
The problem states that the plot's value is 56% more than the car's value at the end of the sixth year. This translates to the equation:
1. 56P = 0.54C + 0.56 * 0.54C
2. 56P = 0.54C * 1.56
3. 56P = 0.8424C
Now, we need to find the difference between the initial prices, which is C - P (or P - C, we'll deal with the sign later). Let's express P in terms of C:
P = (0.8424 / 1.56) * C
P = 0.54C
Therefore, the difference between the initial prices is C - P = C - 0.54C = 0.46C
Since the question asks "How much less did he pay for the plot than the car...", and we have found that P = 0.54C then, the cost of the plot is less than the cost of the car.
To solve the percentage difference:
Difference = C-P = C - 0.54C = 0.46C
Therefore the plot cost 0.46 less than the car.
The correct answer is 0.46.