Question:medium

Read the passage and answer the question.

Passage (extract): In establishing a social order on this pattern, there was a strong possibility of a conflict arising between diverse groups and classes of our own people. Experience shows that man values his possessions even more than his life. A new order cannot be established without radically changing the mind and attitude of men towards property and, at some stage or the other, the 'haves' have to yield place to the 'have-nots'. In the ultimate analysis it is difficult, if not impossible, to say that the instinct to possess has been rooted out or that it will not reappear in an even worse form under a different guise. If egalitarianism is to endure, it has to be based on voluntary, enlightened renunciation of those goods which cannot be shared by others or can be enjoyed only at the expense of others.

Which of the following conclusions can be deduced from the passage?

Show Hint

Chain up the lines about the unfinished part being harder, possessions valued above life, and the instinct that cannot be rooted out.
Updated On: Oct 30, 2026
  • A social order based on truth and non-violence alone can help the achievement of political freedom.
  • After establishing the social order of Gandhiji's pattern, the possibility of a conflict between different classes of society will hardly exist.
  • It is difficult to change the mind and attitude of men towards property.
  • In an egalitarian society, material satisfaction can be enjoyed only at the expense of others.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
A deduction must follow from the passage. It need not be printed there, but nothing outside the passage may be needed to reach it. Anything the passage denies is out at once.

Step 2: Key Formula or Approach:
Run two checks on each option. Check one, does the passage contradict it? If yes, reject. Check two, can two or three lines of the passage be chained to reach it? If yes, accept.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Option (B) fails check one immediately. The passage says that in establishing a social order on Gandhiji's pattern there was a strong possibility of conflict between our own groups and classes. It adds that the instinct to possess may reappear in an even worse form under a different guise. So conflict hardly existing is denied by the text.
Option (A) also fails check one. The passage puts political freedom first and the new social order second, and calls the second harder and still unfinished. It never treats the social order as the means to political freedom.
Option (D) fails check one too. The phrase about goods enjoyed at the expense of others belongs to the list of things to be renounced. An egalitarian society founded on renunciation is where that enjoyment ends, not where it rules.
Option (C) passes check two. Chain the lines. Man values possessions more than his life. A new order needs a radical change in his attitude to property. That unfinished task was harder than winning political freedom. And in the ultimate analysis the writer doubts the instinct to possess can be rooted out. Each link makes changing attitudes to property look harder, and the conclusion in (C) is exactly that.

Step 4: Final Answer:
Only option (C) can be deduced from the passage, so it is correct.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in CLAT exam