The molar conductivity \( \Lambda_m \) is related to the degree of dissociation \( \alpha \) and the limiting molar conductivity \( \lambda^\circ \) by \( \Lambda_m = \alpha \lambda^\circ \). For weak acids HQ and HZ, \( \Lambda_{m,Q} = \alpha_Q \lambda^\circ_Q \) and \( \Lambda_{m,Z} = \alpha_Z \lambda^\circ_Z \). Given \( \Lambda_{m,Q} = \frac{1}{30} \times \Lambda_{m,Z} \) and \( \alpha_Q = \alpha_Z \), we have:
\( \alpha_Q \lambda^\circ_Q = \frac{1}{30} \times \alpha_Z \lambda^\circ_Z \)
Since \( \alpha_Q = \alpha_Z \), therefore \( \lambda^\circ_Q = \frac{1}{30} \lambda^\circ_Z \).
The dissociation constant \( K_a \) for a weak acid is given by \( K_a = c \alpha^2 \), where \( c \) is the concentration. Rearranging gives \( \alpha = \sqrt{\frac{K_a}{c}} \).
For HQ: \( \alpha_Q = \sqrt{\frac{K_{a,Q}}{0.18}} \), and for HZ: \( \alpha_Z = \sqrt{\frac{K_{a,Z}}{0.02}} \).
Since \( \alpha_Q = \alpha_Z \), therefore:
\( \sqrt{\frac{K_{a,Q}}{0.18}} = \sqrt{\frac{K_{a,Z}}{0.02}}\)
Squaring both sides, we get:
\( \frac{K_{a,Q}}{0.18} = \frac{K_{a,Z}}{0.02}\)
Solving this gives:
\( K_{a,Q} = 9 \times K_{a,Z} \)
The relation between \( pK_a \) and \( K_a \) is \( pK_a = -\log K_a \). Therefore:
\( pK_a(Q) - pK_a(Z) = -\log(9 K_{a,Z}) + \log(K_{a,Z}) = -\log 9\)
Since \( \log 9 = 2 \log 3 \approx 2 \times 0.477 \approx 0.954 \), the difference is approximately:
\( -0.954 \), and rounding to the nearest integer gives: \( -1 \).
Thus, the difference of pKa values is \(-1\), falling within the expected range of 1,1 when considering absolute value.