Question

Match the LIST-I with LIST-II \

LIST-I	LIST-II
A. It said fine for parking, so I parked my car here.	I. Petitio Principii
B. She is not famous because she is not well known.	II. Composition
C. I can lift every single part of my car. So, I can lift my car.	III. Equivocation
D. Have you stopped cheating in your exams?	IV. Complex Question

Choose the correct answer from the options given below:

• A. A- III, B- I, C- II, D- IV
• B. A- I, B- II, C- III, D- IV
• C. A- I, B- III, C- II, D- IV
• D. A- III, B- IV, C- I, D- II

Hint:

In logic, recognizing fallacies like Equivocation, Petitio Principii, and Complex Question can help in evaluating arguments and avoiding circular reasoning.

Answer 1

The Correct Option is A

Step 1: Assigning logical fallacies to statements.
- A. "It said fine for parking, so I parked my car here" exemplifies Equivocation due to the ambiguous use of "fine". - B. "She is not famous because she is not well known" is an instance of Petitio Principii (circular reasoning) as it reiterates the same concept. - C. "I can lift every single part of my car. So, I can lift my car" is a classic example of Composition, wrongly assuming properties of parts apply to the whole. - D. "Have you stopped cheating in your exams?" is a Complex Question fallacy, presupposing the truth of an unproven assertion (cheating).
Step 2: Correct pairings. The correct pairings are: - A - III (Equivocation) - B - I (Petitio Principii) - C - II (Composition) - D - IV (Complex Question)
Final Answer: \[ \boxed{\text{The correct answer is 1. A - III, B - I, C - II, D - IV.}} \]