The main statement says a poor exam result can only occur if the teaching standard has been destroyed, in short, poor result requires a destroyed standard.
Flipping this around the only logically safe way, if the standard was not destroyed, a poor result could not have occurred either, giving 'standard not destroyed' leading to 'result not poor', exactly statements 2 and 3 in that order.
Every other pairing either contradicts itself outright, poor implying not poor, or not-destroyed implying destroyed, or reverses the direction of the original conditional.
Therefore, the correct answer is 2, 3.
"Only if the teaching standard is destroyed, will examination result be poor" means a destroyed teaching standard is a necessary condition for a poor result, without it being destroyed, a poor result simply cannot happen.
Since a destroyed teaching standard is required before a poor result can occur, an intact standard guarantees the result was not poor, exactly the pairing of statements 2 and 3.
Therefore, the correct answer is 2, 3.