Let $ A $ be the set of all functions $ f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z} $ and $ R $ be a relation on $ A $ such that $$ R = \{ (f, g) : f(0) = g(1) \text{ and } f(1) = g(0) \} $$ Then $ R $ is:
Symmetric and transitive but not reflective
Symmetric but neither reflective nor transitive
Reflexive but neither symmetric nor transitive
Transitive but neither reflexive nor symmetric
This problem requires an examination of the properties (reflexive, symmetric, transitive) of a relation \(R\) defined on the set \(A\), which comprises all functions \(f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}\). The relation \(R\) is formally defined as \(R = \{ (f, g) : f(0) = g(1) \text{ and } f(1) = g(0) \}\).
For a relation \(R\) on a set \(A\):
The following steps will evaluate the relation \(R\) against these properties.
Step 1: Check for Reflexivity
Reflexivity mandates that for every function \(f \in A\), the condition \((f, f) \in R\) must hold. This translates to:
\[ f(0) = f(1) \quad \text{and} \quad f(1) = f(0) \]
The requirement simplifies to \(f(0) = f(1)\) for all functions \(f: \mathbb{Z} \to \mathbb{Z}\). Since \(A\) contains all such functions, we can find a function where this is not true. For instance, consider \(f(x) = x\). For this function, \(f(0) = 0\) and \(f(1) = 1\). As \(f(0) eq f(1)\), the condition \((f, f) \in R\) is not satisfied for this \(f\). Therefore, the relation is not reflexive.
Step 2: Check for Symmetry
Symmetry requires that if \((f, g) \in R\), then \((g, f) \in R\) must also hold. Assuming \((f, g) \in R\) implies:
\[ f(0) = g(1) \quad \text{and} \quad f(1) = g(0) \]
Now, let's examine the condition for \((g, f) \in R\):
\[ g(0) = f(1) \quad \text{and} \quad g(1) = f(0) \]
The conditions defining \((f, g) \in R\) are identical to those defining \((g, f) \in R\). Thus, if the first set of equalities holds, the second set is automatically satisfied. Consequently, the relation is symmetric.
Step 3: Check for Transitivity
Transitivity requires that if \((f, g) \in R\) and \((g, h) \in R\), then \((f, h) \in R\) must hold. Assume \((f, g) \in R\) and \((g, h) \in R\). From \((f, g) \in R\):
\[ f(0) = g(1) \quad \text{and} \quad f(1) = g(0) \quad \cdots (1) \]
From \((g, h) \in R\):
\[ g(0) = h(1) \quad \text{and} \quad g(1) = h(0) \quad \cdots (2) \]
To check if \((f, h) \in R\), we need to verify if \(f(0) = h(1)\) and \(f(1) = h(0)\). Using equations (1) and (2):
From \(f(1) = g(0)\) and \(g(0) = h(1)\), we deduce \(f(1) = h(1)\).
From \(f(0) = g(1)\) and \(g(1) = h(0)\), we deduce \(f(0) = h(0)\).
The condition for transitivity is \(f(0) = h(1)\) and \(f(1) = h(0)\). Let's construct a counterexample. Define three functions:
This gives us \(f(0)=1, f(1)=2\), and \(h(0)=1, h(1)=2\). Now, we check the condition for \((f, h) \in R\): Is \(f(0) = h(1)\)? We have \(f(0) = 1\) and \(h(1) = 2\). Since \(1 eq 2\), this condition is not met.
As we found a scenario where \((f, g) \in R\) and \((g, h) \in R\) but \((f, h) otin R\), the relation is not transitive.
Based on the analysis:
Therefore, the relation \( R \) is Symmetric but neither reflexive nor transitive.