Step 1: Recall the directing rule. In aromatic electrophilic substitution, the group already on the ring decides where the electrophile attacks. Electron-donating groups send it to ortho and para, electron-withdrawing groups send it to meta.
Step 2: Look at phenol. $-OH$ donates electrons by resonance, so it is ortho and para directing, not meta.
Step 3: Look at chlorobenzene. $-Cl$ withdraws by induction but donates by resonance, and overall it is ortho and para directing. So not meta.
Step 4: Look at aniline. $-NH_2$ is a strong electron donor by resonance, hence ortho and para directing. Not meta.
Step 5: Look at nitrobenzene. $-NO_2$ strongly pulls electrons out of the ring, leaving the meta position least deactivated, so it is meta directing.
Step 6: Conclusion. Only nitrobenzene directs the electrophile to the meta position. \[ \boxed{\text{Nitrobenzene}} \]
Was this answer helpful?
0
Top Questions on Nucleophilic and electrophilic substitution reactions (both aromatic and aliphatic)