To assess the veracity of the provided statements concerning the oxidation states of Group 16 elements, a detailed examination is required.
- Statement (I): Oxygen, as the first member of group 16, exclusively exhibits a –2 oxidation state.
- Oxygen is indeed the inaugural element of Group 16. While it most commonly displays a –2 oxidation state in its compounds, this is not exclusive. For instance, in peroxides such as \(\text{H}_2\text{O}_2\), oxygen's oxidation state is –1. Furthermore, in compounds like \(\text{OF}_2\), oxygen exhibits a +2 oxidation state.
- Consequently, Statement (I) is deemed incorrect due to the demonstrated variability in oxygen's oxidation states.
- Statement (II): The stability of the +4 oxidation state diminishes down group 16, while the stability of the +6 oxidation state increases.
- Within Group 16, comprising Oxygen, Sulfur, Selenium, Tellurium, and Polonium, the stability of oxidation states varies across the elements.
- Moving vertically down the group, the propensity for elements to achieve a +6 oxidation state generally decreases, primarily due to the inert pair effect, which becomes more pronounced in the heavier elements. In contrast, the +4 oxidation state is observed to be more stable in the heavier Group 16 elements, such as Selenium and Tellurium, relative to the +6 state.
- Therefore, Statement (II) is incorrect. The stability trend described is the inverse of the observed behavior.
Based on the foregoing analysis, it is concluded that both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect. Accordingly, the correct determination is:
Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect
.