To evaluate the statements regarding the energy of a satellite orbiting Earth, we need to understand the relationship between the total energy, potential energy, and kinetic energy of a satellite.
Conceptual Explanation:
- Total Energy (\(E\)): The total mechanical energy of a satellite in orbit is the sum of its kinetic energy (\(K\)) and potential energy (\(U\)). The total energy for a bound satellite is always negative.
- Potential Energy (\(U\)): The gravitational potential energy of a satellite at a distance \(r\) from the center of the Earth is given by \(U = -\frac{GMm}{r}\), where \(G\) is the gravitational constant, \(M\) is the mass of the Earth, and \(m\) is the mass of the satellite.
- Kinetic Energy (\(K\)): The kinetic energy of a satellite in orbit is given by \(K = \frac{1}{2}mv^2\).
Relation of Energies for Satellite:
- The total energy \(E\) of a satellite in a stable orbit is given by:
\[
E = -\frac{GMm}{2r}
\]
- The potential energy \(U\) is:
\[
U = -\frac{GMm}{r} = 2E
\]
Thus, the potential energy is actually twice the total energy (magnitude-wise) but negative.
- The kinetic energy \(K\) equals:
\[
K = \frac{GMm}{2r} = -E
\]
Hence, the kinetic energy equals the negative of the total energy.
Analysis of Statements:
- Statement I: "If \(E\) be the total energy of a satellite moving around the earth, then its potential energy will be \(\frac{E}{2}\)."
Analysis: As derived above, the potential energy \(U\) is not \(\frac{E}{2}\); rather it is \(2E\). Therefore, this statement is incorrect.
- Statement II: "The kinetic energy of a satellite revolving in an orbit is equal to the half the magnitude of total energy \(E\)."
Analysis: The kinetic energy \(K\) is \(-E\), which is not half the magnitude of \(E\); it is actually equal in magnitude to the total energy. Thus, this statement is incorrect.
Conclusion: Based on the analysis, both statements are incorrect. Therefore, the answer is:
Both Statement I and Statement II are incorrect