To verify the accuracy of the provided assertions concerning historical scientific observations:
Assertion (I): "The Law of Octaves arranged elements based on ascending atomic number."
Analysis: John Newlands' Law of Octaves (1864) ordered elements by increasing atomic mass, not atomic number. It noted that every eighth element exhibited similar properties, analogous to musical octaves. Consequently, this assertion is false.
Assertion (II): "Meyer detected a repeating pattern in physical properties when plotted against atomic numbers."
Analysis: Julius Lothar Meyer contributed to the periodic table's development by plotting physical properties (e.g., atomic volume) against atomic masses, revealing a periodic trend. While atomic masses were used, the observed periodicity aligns with the concept of the periodic law. Therefore, this assertion is considered true regarding the development of periodic trends.
Conclusion: The accurate assessment is: "Assertion I is false, while Assertion II is true."

Why is \( Cr^{2+} \) strongly reducing while \( Mn^{3+} \) is strongly oxidizing?
| List - I(Block/group in periodic table) | List - II(Element) |
|---|---|
| (A) Lanthanoid | (I) Ce |
| (B) d-block element | (II) As |
| (C) p-block element | (III) Cs |
| (D) s-block element | (IV) Mn |