The given question involves understanding the concepts of thermodynamics and electrochemistry, particularly relating to the Gibbs free energy change (\(\Delta_rG\)) and cell potential (\(E_{cell}\)). Let's analyze each statement to determine their correctness:
- Assertion A: In the equation \(\Delta_rG = -nFE_{cell}\), the value of \(\Delta_rG\) depends on n.
- The equation \(\Delta_rG = -nFE_{cell}\) is the standard relationship between the Gibbs free energy change, the number of moles of electrons transferred (\(n\)), Faraday's constant (\(F\)), and the cell potential (\(E_{cell}\)).
- Gibbs free energy change (\(\Delta_rG\)) is an extensive property, meaning it depends on the quantity of matter present (in this case, the number of moles \(n\)).
- Therefore, \(\Delta_rG\) indeed depends on \(n\).
- Reason R: \(E_{cell}\) is an intensive property and \(\Delta_rG\) is an extensive property.
- \(E_{cell}\) is an intensive property, which means it does not depend on the amount of substance present; it is determined by the nature of the chemical reaction and conditions such as temperature and pressure.
- \(\Delta_rG\), on the other hand, is extensive because it depends on the total amount of reactants or products involved in the reaction (hence depends on n).
Considering both statements A and R:
- A is correct because \(\Delta_rG\) does depend on n.
- R is correct because it accurately describes the nature of \(E_{cell}\) as an intensive property and \(\Delta_rG\) as an extensive property.
- Furthermore, R correctly explains why A is true; since \(\Delta_rG\) is extensive, it depends on the amount of substance (or number of moles, \(n\)).
Therefore, the correct answer is: Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.