Comprehension
Down by the sandy banks of the Yamuna River, the men must work quickly. At a little past 12 a.m. one humid night in May, they pull back the black plastic tarp covering three boreholes sunk deep in the ground. They then drag thick hoses toward a queue of 20-odd tanker trucks idling quietly with their headlights turned off. The men work in a team: While one man fits a hose’s mouth over a borehole, another clambers atop a truck at the front of the line and shoves the tube’s opposite end into the empty steel cistern attached to the vehicle’s creaky frame. ‘On kar!’ someone shouts in Hinglish; almost instantly, his orders to ‘switch it on’ are obeyed. Diesel generators, housed in nearby sheds, begin to thrum. Submersible pumps, installed in the borehole’s shafts, drone as they disgorge thousands of gallons of groundwater from deep in the earth. The liquid gushes through the hoses and into the trucks’ tanks. The full trucks don’t wait around. As the hose team continues its work, drivers nose down a rutted dirt path until they reach a nearby highway. There, they turn on their lights and pick up speed, rushing to sell their bounty to factories and hospitals, malls and hotels, apartments and hutments across this city of 25 million. Everything about this business is illegal: the boreholes dug without permission, the trucks operating without permits, the water sold without testing or treatment. ‘Water work is night work,’ says a middle-aged neighbour who lives near the covert pumping station and requested anonymity. ‘Bosses arrange buyers, labour fills tankers, the police look the other way, and the muscle makes sure that no one says nothing to nobody.’ Teams like this one are ubiquitous in Delhi, where the official water supply falls short of the city’s needs. A quarter of Delhi’s households live without a piped-water connection; most of the rest receive water for only a few hours each day. So residents have come to rely on private truck owners—the most visible strands of a dispersed web of city councillors, farmers, real estate agents, and fixers who source millions of gallons of water each day from illicit boreholes, and sell the liquid for profit. The entrenched system has a local moniker: the water-tanker mafia. A 2013 audit found that the city loses 60 percent of its water supply to leakages, theft, and a failure to collect revenue. The mafia defends its work as a community service, but there is a much darker picture of Delhi’s subversive water industry: one of a thriving black market populated by small-time freelance agents who are exploiting a fast-depleting common resource and in turn threatening India’s long-term water security.
[Extracted, with edits and revisions, from: “At the Mercy of the Water Mafia”, by Aman Sethi, Foreign Policy]
Question: 1

Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • The water tanker mafia’s operations, though illegal, are justified given the vital service they provide to the people of Delhi.
  • The water supplied by the water tanker mafia is potentially contaminated.
  • Private truck owners play the most important role in the operations of the water tanker mafia.
  • The water supplied by the water tank mafia is meant primarily for residential use.
Show Solution

The Correct Option is B

Solution and Explanation

Understanding the Question:
We need to identify which statement is actually supported by the passage's own words, rather than one that merely sounds reasonable about an illegal water trade.

Key Approach:
Match each option to a specific line in the passage, since an inference question rewards direct textual support over general plausibility.

Detailed Explanation:
The passage explicitly says the water is sold 'without testing or treatment,' which directly supports the idea that it may be unsafe or contaminated. It does not endorse the trade as 'justified,' since it goes on to call the fuller picture a 'thriving black market' that threatens water security. It describes truck owners as the 'most visible' part of a wider network, not necessarily the 'most important' part. It also lists buyers across factories, hospitals, malls, hotels, apartments and informal settlements, not primarily residential ones.

Final Answer:
The statement directly supported by the passage is that the water supplied is potentially contaminated, matching option (B).
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 2

Which of the following, used in the passage, suggests that the illegal supply of groundwater is not a recent phenomenon?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Entrenched
  • Ubiquitous
  • Long-term water security
  • Fast-depleting common resource
Show Solution

The Correct Option is A

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We need to pick the word that shows the illegal groundwater supply is an old, established practice, not something recent.

Step 2: Key Approach:
Check each option for a built in sense of time or duration. A word that means fixed in place over years fits; a word about spread, a goal, or a shrinking resource does not.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Entrenched means dug in and firmly fixed, the way a habit or a system becomes hard to remove once it has been around long enough. That sense of duration is built into the word itself.
Ubiquitous only tells us the practice is common everywhere, it says nothing about when it started.
Long-term water security is the outcome the passage is worried about protecting, not a description of the illegal supply chain's age.
Fast-depleting common resource describes the groundwater running low, again a comment on the resource, not on how long the illegal trade has existed.

Step 4: Final Answer:
Entrenched is the only word that directly conveys long standing, established practice, so it is the one that signals the illegal supply is not recent.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 3

Which of the following seems to be the author’s main concern in the passage?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Delhi’s water supply infrastructure does not adequately cater to all its residents.
  • The illegal operations of the water tank mafia do not depend on the complicity of a range of actors, including the police and city councillors.
  • The petty profiteering of a few actors comes at the immense cost of India’s sustainable access to water.
  • All the above
Show Solution

The Correct Option is C

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
The question wants the single statement that best captures the author's main concern, not just any true fact mentioned in the passage.

Step 2: Key Approach:
Test each option for accuracy first, then for scope. An option that misstates the passage cannot be the main concern, and among the accurate options, the broadest one wins over a narrower supporting detail.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
The infrastructure gap, that supply does not reach every resident, is a real but narrow point, it explains why tankers exist at all rather than what worries the author most.
The claim that the mafia's operations do not depend on complicity from police and councillors goes against how such illegal water trades are known to run, they typically survive because of exactly that kind of collusion, so this statement misrepresents the situation.
Because that statement is wrong, the option covering all three cannot be correct either.
That leaves the point about petty profiteering coming at the cost of the country's long term water security, which connects a small group's private gain to a much larger, shared loss, making it the passage's central worry.

Step 4: Final Answer:
The author's main concern is that the petty profiteering of a few actors comes at the immense cost of India's sustainable access to water.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 4

All of the following are sounds you can hear as the water tankers are filled, except:

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Creaking
  • Thrumming
  • Droning
  • Gushing
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
Three of the four words describe sounds heard as the tankers fill, one does not belong, and we need to find the odd one out.

Step 2: Key Approach:
Sort the options by what kind of thing they describe: a mechanical, engine-like sound versus the motion of the water itself.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Creaking is the strained sound of metal or pipework flexing under load, exactly what you would expect from tanker parts and fittings during filling.
Thrumming is a steady, vibrating hum, the sound of a pump running with a regular pulse.
Droning is a continuous, low, unbroken hum, again matching an engine or pump at work.
Gushing, on the other hand, describes the forceful rush of the water itself, its motion rather than a mechanical noise, which sets it apart from the other three.

Step 4: Final Answer:
Gushing is the option that is not one of the sounds tied to the machinery filling the tankers, so it is the exception.
Was this answer helpful?
0
Question: 5

Which of the following words from the passage means ‘hidden’?

Updated On: Jul 14, 2026
  • Illicit
  • Idling
  • Subversive
  • Covert
Show Solution

The Correct Option is D

Solution and Explanation

Step 1: Understanding the Question:
We need the option whose meaning is closest to 'hidden'.

Step 2: Key Approach:
Match each word's core dictionary meaning against 'hidden' rather than against ideas loosely connected to secrecy.

Step 3: Detailed Explanation:
Illicit means against the rules or the law, it is about legality, not visibility.
Idling means running or sitting without doing productive work, unrelated to being hidden.
Subversive means working to undermine an established system, the emphasis is on the undermining, not on concealment as such.
Covert means done secretly, concealed from view, which matches 'hidden' directly.

Step 4: Final Answer:
Covert is the word that means 'hidden'.
Was this answer helpful?
0

Top Questions on Reading Comprehension


Questions Asked in CLAT exam