To determine if \( R_1 \) and \( R_2 \) are equivalence relations, we will verify reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity.
Relation \( R_1 \):
- Reflexivity: For \( a R_1 a \), we require \( a^2 + a^2 = 1 \), which simplifies to \( 2a^2 = 1 \). This condition is not met for all \( a \in \mathbb{R} \), thus \( R_1 \) is not reflexive.
- Symmetry: Assume \( a R_1 b \), meaning \( a^2 + b^2 = 1 \). Since \( a^2 + b^2 = 1 \) implies \( b^2 + a^2 = 1 \), it follows that \( b R_1 a \). Therefore, \( R_1 \) is symmetric.
- Transitivity: If \( a R_1 b \) and \( b R_1 c \), then \( a^2 + b^2 = 1 \) and \( b^2 + c^2 = 1 \). Summing these equations yields \( a^2 + 2b^2 + c^2 = 2 \). This does not necessarily imply \( a^2 + c^2 = 1 \) unless \( b^2 = 0 \), which is not universally true for all \( a, b, c \). Consequently, \( R_1 \) is not transitive.
As \( R_1 \) fails reflexivity and transitivity, it is not an equivalence relation.
Relation \( R_2 \):
- Reflexivity: For \( (a, b) R_2 (a, b) \), we need \( a + b = b + a \). This equality holds for all \( (a, b) \in \mathbb{N} \times \mathbb{N} \), confirming \( R_2 \) is reflexive.
- Symmetry: If \( (a, b) R_2 (c, d) \), then \( a + d = b + c \). Rearranging this gives \( c + b = d + a \), which means \( (c, d) R_2 (a, b) \). Thus, \( R_2 \) is symmetric.
- Transitivity: Let \( (a, b) R_2 (c, d) \) and \( (c, d) R_2 (e, f) \). This implies \( a + d = b + c \) and \( c + f = d + e \). Adding these two equations results in \( a + f = b + e \). This shows that \( (a, b) R_2 (e, f) \), proving \( R_2 \) is transitive.
Since \( R_2 \) exhibits reflexivity, symmetry, and transitivity, it is an equivalence relation.
Based on these findings, the correct conclusion is: Only \( R_2 \) is an equivalence relation.