Project and Test Score Parameters:
Minimum score: 40
Maximum score: 80
Average score: 60
Test Score Distribution:
Scores are multiples of 10.
There are four distinct scores and two scores equal to the average (60).
Possible test scores: 40, 50, 60, 60, 70, 80
Individual Performance Data:
Amala's project score is twice Koli's. Koli's test score is 20 points higher than Amala's.
Amala achieved the highest overall aggregate score.
Shyamal had the second-highest test score. His aggregate score was 2 points less than Amala's, and his test score was 2 points more than Koli's, but 2 points less than Amala's. (Correction: The text states Shyamal scored 2 more than Koli, but 2 less than Amala in aggregate. The test score detail seems to conflict with the aggregate detail. Re-evaluating based on the aggregate calculation later.)
Biman achieved the second-lowest test score and the lowest aggregate score.
Mathew's project score exceeded Rini's, while his test score was lower than Rini's.
Score Determination Process:
Amala and Koli's Scores Analysis:
Let $P_K$ represent Koli's project score; Amala's project score is $2P_K$.
Let $T_A$ represent Amala's test score; Koli's test score is $T_K = T_A + 20$.
Test Score Allocation:
To fulfill all conditions, the available test scores are 40, 50, 60, 60, 70, 80.
Amala's and Koli's test scores ($T_A, T_K$) must be chosen from this set.
Amala's Test Score Determination:
Amala's highest aggregate suggests $T_A$ should be a high value.
Attempt 1: $T_A = 80 \Rightarrow T_K = 80 + 20 = 100$ (Invalid score).
Attempt 2: $T_A = 70 \Rightarrow T_K = 70 + 20 = 90$ (Invalid score).
Attempt 3: $T_A = 60 \Rightarrow T_K = 60 + 20 = 80$. Both scores (60, 80) are valid and available. This is a potential assignment.
Shyamal's Test Score Determination:
Shyamal's aggregate is 2 less than Amala's. Based on the successful assignment for Amala ($T_A=60$) and the overall score distribution, Shyamal's test score should be the next highest available distinct score after Amala's. The phrasing "Shyamal scored the second highest in the test" implies a comparison to *all* test scores, not just distinct ones. Given Amala has 60, and the highest distinct scores are 80 and 70, Shyamal's test score is likely 70, making his aggregate 2 less than Amala's (assuming Amala's aggregate calculation uses her test score of 60). Let's proceed with $T_S = 70$.
Biman's Scores Determination:
Biman's test score is the second lowest: $T_B = 50$.
Biman's aggregate score is the lowest.
Mathew's and Rini's Scores Determination:
Mathew's project score is higher than Rini's, but his test score is lower.
Remaining test scores to be assigned: 40, 60 (one 60 was assigned to Amala, the other 60 is available). The remaining distinct scores are 40 and 60.
To satisfy Mathew scoring less than Rini in the test, Mathew's test score is 40, and Rini's test score is 60.
Conclusion:
The individual who scored 60 in the test is Rini.
Correct option is (B): 60 Marks.