Assertion (A): We cannot form a p-n junction diode by taking a slab of a p-type semiconductor and physically joining it to another slab of an n-type semiconductor.
Reason (R): In a p-type semiconductor, \( n_e \gg n_h \) while in an n-type semiconductor \( n_h \gg n_e \).
It is not possible to create a p-n junction diode by physically joining a slab of p-type semiconductor with a slab of n-type semiconductor.
In a p-type semiconductor, the concentration of electrons (\( n_e \)) is significantly less than the concentration of holes (\( n_h \)), i.e., \( n_e \ll n_h \), whereas in an n-type semiconductor, the concentration of holes (\( n_h \)) is significantly less than the concentration of electrons (\( n_e \)), i.e., \( n_h \ll n_e \).
Let's analyze the assertion and the reason:
While both the assertion and the reason contain true statements about semiconductor properties, the reason does not validate the assertion. The assertion itself is factually incorrect, as a p-n junction is indeed formed by the physical interface between p-type and n-type semiconductors.
Option 2: Both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are true, but Reason (R) is not the correct explanation of Assertion (A).
A small bob A of mass m is attached to a massless rigid rod of length 1 m pivoted at point P and kept at an angle of 60° with vertical. At 1 m below P, bob B is kept on a smooth surface. If bob B just manages to complete the circular path of radius R after being hit elastically by A, then radius R is_______ m :